Talk:Lift Yourself/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by LOVI33 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 15:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

You guys are the two editors I work with the most, so it will be cool to review an article you guys nominated together. LOVI33 15:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Request

May I request we please address the genres in the infobox? I'm not sure if "scat" is considered a music genre. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Another Believer I have contributed to this discussion on the talk page now. --K. Peake 20:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • I am aware that there is currently a discussion going on if "scat" is a musical genre, but are you sure it should be included in the infobox even if it is, as you are referring specifically to West's vocals, not the song itself.
  • Thank you for your awareness and the discussion has been solved by now, though it should have been if classified as a genre because it would not have been writing "scatting" --K. Peake 16:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Confirm that the "proper lyrics" version is unreleased

Background and development

edit
  • Great prose writing!

Composition

edit
  • Retitle to "Composition and lyrics" to be more specific

Release and reception

edit

Commercial performance

edit
  • Merge into 1 paragraph as short paragraphs are discouraged since they can inhibit the flow of the text.

Live performances and other usage

edit
  • Looks good!

Track listing

edit
  • Are you sure this section is needed since there is only one track listing?

Credits and personnel

edit
  • Looks good!

Charts

edit
  • Looks good!

Release history

edit
  • Are you sure this section is needed since there is only one release date?

Notes

edit
  • "West's eight studio" → "West's eighth studio"

References

edit
  • Copyvio score looks good at 31.5%.
  • Great job on the citations, all of them look good. I just noticed a few are unarchived, please archive them
edit
  • Looks Good!

Final comments and verdict

edit
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.