Talk:Light the Beam

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 04:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that after each win, the Sacramento Kings light the beam? Source: https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/kings/kings-victory-beam-vivek-ranadive-tells-story-behind-purple-spectacle
  • Reviewed: Endure and Survive
  • Comment: It's still firmly Feb. 5 in my time zone, so the article is still within the one week eligibility period. Will complete QPQ soon.

Created by Soulbust (talk). Self-nominated at 00:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Light the Beam, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Actually, at 7.75 days between creation and nomination (no time zone shenanigans!), this would fall outside the 7-day limit – but IAR, as is routine :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 01:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Haha true, I was just trying to make sure just in case anyone saw it as nominated on Feb 6, which would definitely be out of the one-week period. Soulbust (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

QPQ is complete now. Soulbust (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

General eligibility:

• New enough: - Strictly speaking, this was over 7 days, but I am going to ignore this in light of Theleekycauldron's comment above.
• Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Earwig lights up on copyright, but it's more or less all properly attributed quotation of someone's utterances. Doesn't technically pass the 7-day criteria, but I'm fine to let it slide. Looks good to me. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)