Talk:Lillian Haldeman Moore

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Lillian V. Holdeman Moore identified a spike in hydrogen-gas producing bacteria in Skylab astronauts? Source: Sachs, Jessica Snyder (2008-09-30). Good Germs, Bad Germs: Health and Survival in a Bacterial World. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-1-4299-2329-3.
  • Reviewed:

Created by PlantPoet (talk). Self-nominated at 16:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lillian V. Holdeman Moore; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - Page number is needed for the book. If you read the book, you will also find that "Holdeman observed that astronauts had a 25% increase in the intestinal populations of hydrogen-gas-producing" is false. The increase was much larger, with the population increasing 13 times and accounting for the 25% of the total bacteria population. I tried to find the scientific publication in scholar but failed ( I found the other one mentioned about the stress). Also, I added two citation needed tags.
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: C messier (talk) 16:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

• Hey there, PlantPoet! Checking in, have you seen the review? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
  • C messier, theleekycauldron, I pinged PlantPoet on their talk page last week, and they subsequently edited the article per the comments above, noting in a reply that they'd done. Have the issues raised in the review been sufficiently addressed by those edits? Does anything else remain? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
    • There are some citation needed tags. C messier (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Oh no! I will get on them this week. Right now, I can't find the citation needed tags, but I'm new and will have to search around to figure out where they are. Sorry! PlantPoet (talk) 23:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

citations have been added. Thank you so much for your patience! PlantPoet (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

C messier, does this satisfy your concerns, or is there more that needs to be done? Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

There are three more (two in the lead and one in the career section) C messier (talk) 15:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

@C messier: From my quick skim, I think all of the paragraphs are now cited. Does this satisfy your concerns? Z1720 (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

It looks OK now. C messier (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)