Talk:Linda Addison (lawyer)

Valid Entry?

How does the self-serving material constituting the entirety of this page qualify as a valid Wikipedia entry? It appears to be someone simply posting her own c.v. as if it were important reference material for the rest of us. azaner 19:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

   Addison is incredibly accomplished as a trial attorney, and as a "trailblazer" for Texas women litigators, I believe she is worthy of a wiki page.  Having known her for several years, I can vouch that she never would have posted this herself -- she's too damn busy to care about something like this! Just my two cents.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.28.226.42 (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC) 

Simply being a highly skilled lawyer does not merit a wiki page. Many lawyers have similar accomplishments. This page reads like an advertisement for Ms. Addison. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.197.14.40 (talk) 22:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linda Addison (lawyer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140727040345/http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html to http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 10 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

---

Linda Addison (lawyer) → Linda Addison (business executive and lawyer) – clarify disambiguation; Linda Addison has transitioned to a new career path Lihsa2016 (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). -- /Alex/₂₁ 21:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

• Contested: Excessively verbose. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose – Per my prior comment on the requesting editor's talk page. Per WP:CONCISE we only need to provide "sufficient information to identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject area." The disambiguator does not need to include everything this Linda Addison has ever done. The term 'lawyer' seems sufficient. The other person also called Linda Addison is Linda Addison (poet). EdJohnston (talk) 21:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.