Talk:List of EFL Cup finals

Featured listList of EFL Cup finals is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 24, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
February 14, 2009Featured list candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:36, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply



– After the page-move of List of Football League Cup winners and the following discussion on WT:FOOTY, where a couple of editors suggested that lists like these are a list of finals rather then a list of winners, and should be renamed thereafter. Because of consistency, I've turned this into a multi-proposal with most of the biggest cup-competition in football, plus some of the minor in Britain. It should also be noted that the World Cup list and the UEFA Euro list was already named "finals". Mentoz86 (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Support and added 2 more: Added MLS Cup winners and US Open Cup winners as well for the same reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenalkid700 (talkcontribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Excessive linking

edit

In the table in the Finals section, is a link to every occurance of each stadium really necessary? The same could be said for the football teams; surely only one link is needed. 86.176.239.183 (talk) 22:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

When a table is sortable or several screens long, we don't know where the reader will find the first instance of a link, so we just link every line. I'm sure there's a guideline for this somewhere, but I can't be arsed to find it. Either way, does it really harm anyone to have the extra links? – PeeJay 23:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

First non-1st division club

edit

The sentence say "The first team from outside the First Division to win the competition was Queen's Park Rangers of the Third Division in 1967." However, the cup was won by Norwich in 1962. In that year Norwich was in the Second Division. So should the shouldn't QPR be removed from the sentence and replced with "The first team from outside the First Division to win the competition was Norwich City of the Second Division in 1962."? I would have changed it but I might be missing something. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of EFL Cup finals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of EFL Cup finals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cup titles changed - reflect in table

edit

Given that the name of this competition has changed so many times, it'd be useful to include a column that shows the name of the competition at that time. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 16:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I disagree. There is a table at EFL_Cup#Sponsorship that explains the various name changes, so that should be enough. – PeeJay 21:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
That's terrific, but that's a different article altogether. In this article, the article title misleadingly is "EFL Cup finals" (when most of them weren't EFL Cup finals) and the table is headed, very misleadingly, "EFL Cup winners", when most of the winning teams were, you guessed it, not EFL Cup winners. At least let's help the reader. --22:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Again, I disagree. Can the reader not just take it as read that the EFL Cup and the Football League Cup (sponsored or otherwise) are the same competition? Better yet, why not explain that in the article’s lead? – PeeJay 23:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Improvement suggestions from FA Cup list

edit

I've been looking at List of FA Cup finals, and it seems to be, overall, a better-formatted list. There are some conventions I think we should adopt here:

  •   Done Merge repeated stadium names in the table into a single block.
  •   Done Indicate which of the winners won the Double and the Domestic Treble.
  •   Pending Link the game articles in the score (e.g. 1-0), and the tournament articles in the year (e.g. 2024), so that someone can research both the whole tournament and the individual game from that table row.

    I suppose the issue with this is that the Final column in this table represents the year of the final, but the Season column in the FA Cup article represents the whole season. If we link the whole-tournament article in the leftmost column, it may make sense to change it to represent a whole season, e.g. 2023-24 rather than just 2024.

    I personally think either way is fine, as long as there's both a tournament link and a game link in each row.

The third change would be much easier with some automation, but I'm not sure what's the easiest way to do it. I'm leaning towards just copying the wikitext into a local file and editing it with a python script.

Galagora (talk) 09:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't have an issue with any of the changes apart from the double suggestion. As that references winners of the League and FA Cup it's not relevant to this list. Domestic Treble is fine as the League Cup is included in that. NapHit (talk) 09:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I misread that in the other article, I thought it said League Cup and not League. Galagora (talk) 10:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply