Talk:List of German actors

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved without prejudice to a later split.(non-admin closure) Red Slash 19:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply



List of German actors (from 1895 to the present)List of German actors – This current title is too long and should be shortened. However, the AFD would make this request less likely to be uncontroversial. George Ho (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Support a move to Lists of German film actors, together with splitting off to create new daughter lists, possibly based on the current sections:
All based on a quick overview of the current article. Green Giant (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
But not all actors from the Silent Film Era would be film actors... -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, but the impression I got from the lead was that the article intended to list film actors - "the year of the first public showing of a motion picture by the Lumière brothers" followed by "the period in which their film careers began" and finally "actors that appear in German movies, including those of foreign origin". No part of that suggests stage or other actors. I have however modified my suggestion to reflect this. Green Giant (talk) 11:18, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
If it is to be solely film actors, then the title of the list locations should include "film", otherwise, we are not limited to just that for the list contents. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 12:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Split apart to periods of German history, pre-unification, from unification to end of German Empire, post WWI to end of WWII, post WWII to German reunification, post reunification. This can then be moved as a list of lists to the proposed title. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
All you needed to do was highlight that there was a previous AFD (in fact there was a second related AFD shortly after the first one). What you shouldn't have done is request a speedy deletion followed by a PROD when there is a distinct possibility of creating encyclopaedic lists. Did you suddenly forget that there is a discussion taking place, or are the comments above made by someone else? Just because in 2007, the deleted article had numerous redlinks does not mean that we can never have such an article again; indeed the majority of links are blue, and there is no objectionable content. So, let the current discussion finish, and let the new smaller lists be created, before we discuss whether the logic of six years ago still applies. Green Giant (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
This version is virtually identical to the version that was deleted at AFD previously. Though WP:CCC, you'd need to open a new AFD to determine that. The requested move discussion doesn't even touch upon the fact that this is a repost virtually identical to the deleted version. This is simply a repost of the last deleted version with little changed (compare the diffs on the sandboxed version in the incubator, that this was copied from) The order of men and women was swapped, and the column format was changed, but the lists are the same. That's why {{db-repost}} exists, to handle articles that are the same or almost the same as the deleted version. The current article is also a copyright violation, since it doesn't attribute the contributors from which this was copy-and-pasted from, which does not conform to the CC/GFDL licensing of Wikipedia. The simplest manner to handle the copyright violation is to delete the article, and move the requested move discussion to the talk page of the version in the incubator. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Content

edit

Now that this has been renamed to remove the date, this should be expanded to cover all German actors, not just film actors, or it should be renamed again to List of German film actors -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Virtually all of the articles in Category:Lists of actors by nationality are simply "List of x actors" (IE without the word film), so I've removed the tag. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 16:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of German actors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply