Talk:List of Phineas and Ferb characters

Editing cleanup

I tried placing an external links section including the imdb site and some of the links from the main article to help clear up the citation issue but ended up being cleared by a bot? Anyone know why? 68.13.6.96 (talk) 06:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind, I think this might have been because of the wiki link from the main page on P&F 68.13.6.96 (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Is this quote needed? Doofenshmirtz

Even though he and Perry are enemies, they sometimes act like friends. For example, Doofenshmirtz gets a date and asks Perry to act like a mindless pet. A major example is in "It's About Time!", when Doofenshmirtz get a new nemesis named Peter the Panda, Perry goes into a state of depression. But his is just a scam, although, Doofenshmirtz admits that he regretted getting a new nemesis. 68.13.6.96 (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Doofenshmirtz's manner toward Perry reminds me of a Looney Tunes short in which the coyote and the sheepdog stop fighting at 5:00, "see ya tomorrow, Ralph." —Tamfang (talk) 01:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Meap

This is a minor character that appears in a few episodes not a secondary one. Is he (it?) really worth mentioning? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.6.96 (talk) 07:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

There seems to be a few minor characters listed as secondary characters. I missed a few episodes so can anyone help with cleaning that up? Meep, Pinky, and Jenny seem minor to me. Also seems Vivian, Lil Suzzy, and Charlene could be argued as such as well 68.13.6.96 (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

as of november 19, 2017, meap has been removed from the list of characters entirely. meap has gained his many fans, and I would like to see him, as well as climpaloon, peter the panda,the farmer and his wife, and other minor characters included. there are never too many characters mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.40.121.4 (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Conflict

This statement "The animals use the first letter of their species as their code name (i.e. a dog would be Agent D, a chicken would be Agent C, etc.)" doesn't coincide with the statement under Pinky who is also declared as being Agent P. I missed that episode so can anyone else clarify? Should this be removed form Perry's profile? Also does the article really need the info on Pinky? Is he a secondary character or a minor one? 68.13.6.96 (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

It could be a mistake!What if it's not species but name like Waldo the Worm or Dean the Dog because that makes sense.--Yoshi39 (talk) 19:23, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps they meant "Pinky the Poodle" or "Pinky the Puppy"? The species, name, and agent code name all follow the same letter as an alliteration. Bananasoldier (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

"Nationality"

Since when is "Hispanic" a nationality? Why do Isabelle and Bajeet get called "Hispanic" and "Indian" while Buford gats to be "American of Dutch descent". Isabelle (who by her last name is also Jewish) was, I'm sure born in the US. Bajeet, I'm less sure of but am presuming that he was either born here or is naturalized. American is not synonymous with "white".--Tricksterson (talk) 15:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree. However Bajeet was born in India. Isabella's mom is also listed as "Mexican" where have we seen "Mexican". Her accent/name could be from any number of backgrounds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.144.48 (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Too long

Isn't the article getting too long? Do we need to split it up?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 17:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Bajeet is really B-A-L-J-E-E-T — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.248.198.207 (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Jeremy Johnson

This sentence: "Jeremy is 16 years old due to the fact that he can drive a car with no parent meaning he has had his license for 6 months" Just isn't worded right. First it sounds like original research. Second how many states have the law that way now? And do we know for a fact that the 'tri-state area' is one such place? Also (again original research) just being able to drive means that he is OVER the legal driving age, so he could be 17, or even 18. Working in a fast food place is a better reason to be labeled as being 16. He also isn't "often known" for hosting exchange students since he has done this once. (and show me where he was the host of "DD" and not just a friend?). "Chez Platypus" is not the only episode where Candace and Jeremy go on a date. and "Phineas and Ferb Get Busted" was a dream so can't be counted on for accurate info. And if we list every single episode where Jeremy and Candace interact, it will A: get very long, and B: become a list. I feel key episodes in their relationship should be the only ones mentioned.

The whole paragraph should be rewritten to something like: Jeremy is around the same age as Candace. He can drive a car without a parent and works at "Mr. Slushy Burger", sometimes called "Mr. Slushy Dawg" (a parody of Burger King). Candace has a crush on Jeremy and it seems he also likes her. They are first seen in a romantic view in "Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror!". They also go on dates as seen in "Chez Platypus" where they have a romantic dinner together and "Journey to the Center of Candace" when Jeremy has a sandwich named after Candace at his uncles restaurant. Actucally they say Jeremy is one year older than her inside the 2D Dimesion movie proving he actually is 16 years old.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.144.48 (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I’m sorry if I’m wrong, but I don’t remember if Candace’s age is actually clarified. It’s possible that he IS 16 because in most countries you have to be 16-up to drive a car, (and he DOES drive in “My Sweet Ride”) though I agree he may be older. Additionally, his age is also never clarified but we know that he’s 16 or older and at least one year older than Candace (as she refers to him that way in 2nd Dimension) so both their ages aren’t clear (but we get more information about Jeremy’s age). Still, it’s possible they can be deciphered some way. 207.136.88.24 (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Too long (The sequel)

We really need to do something about the length. Do we even need a section about characters who have only been in one episode?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Honestly I was happy they were finally pulled from the secondary character list. I think you might be right though. A few characters probably need to be zapped. What we could do is place them here on the dicussion board. If they appear in enough episodes, then someone could pull them to the main page.

I think the floating baby head should be added to minor.

Buford

Isn't Buford missing a chromezone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.97.95 (talk) 19:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Phineas & Ferb's Age

In the episode "Phineas & Ferb's Quantun Boogaloo", it is implied Phineas & Ferb are 10. First off, they travel 20 years into the future. Secondly, their future mother says "My Phineas & Ferb are 30 years old now." And, quite clearly 30 - 20 = 10. No Phineas is very likely 11 afterr his birthday.

However, Phineas goes to college for the first time in ten years after the events of the series. It is shown in the film «Act Your Age». It is doubtful that Phineas went to college at the age of 20 years. We can be sure only that he is of school age. --Gplover (talk) 08:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

perhaps they are eight years old for the majority of the series. then they would be 18 in act your age. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.40.121.4 (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in List of characters in Phineas and Ferb

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of characters in Phineas and Ferb's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AM1":

• From Phineas and Ferb: Strike, Joe. "From Swampy & Dan Emerges Phineas and Ferb", Page 1". Animation World Magazine. Retrieved 2009-08-26.
• From Rollercoaster (Phineas and Ferb): Strike, Joe. "From Swampy & Dan Emerges Phineas and Ferb", Page 1". Animation World Magazine.
• From Dan Povenmire: Strike, Joe (2008-02-01). "From Swampy & Dan Emerges Phineas and Ferb", Page 1". Animation World Magazine.
• From Phineas Flynn: Strike, Joe. "From Swampy & Dan Emerges Phineas and Ferb", Page 1". Animation World Magazine.

Reference named "podcast":

• From Flop Starz: Dan Povenmire, Jeff "Swampy" Marsh. "The Geek Dads" Podcast interview with Povenmire & Marsh (Podcast). Wired. Retrieved 2009-08-14.
• From Phineas and Ferb (video game): Dan Povenmire, Jeff "Swampy" Marsh. "The Geek Dads" Podcast interview with Povenmire & Marsh.
• From Phineas Flynn: Dan Povenmire, Jeff "Swampy" Marsh. "The Geek Dads" Podcast interview with Povenmire & Marsh (Audio). {{cite AV media}}: Text "accessdate-2009-09-30" ignored (help)
• From Jeff "Swampy" Marsh: "Geek Dads Podcast Interview with Povenmire and Marsh]]".

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Perry The Platypus

Not sure who it was but somebody has listed Frank Welker as Perry instead of Dee Bradley Baker. pretty sure it has been well established that Dee is the voice for Perry but I am not going to make the edit, I'll leave that up to the more experienced editors.--Nick4leader (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I fixed it a few days ago, so it now says Dee Bradley Baker.69.228.210.138 (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Additional Pages Needed, Soon

Additional Pages are becoming necessary for Candace Flynn, Ferb Fletcher, Heinz Doofenschmirtz, Perry the Platypus, Linda Flynn-Fletcher, and Isabella Garcia-Shapiro as well as a page for the growing list of Minor Characters appearing on the show. If anybody need a reason why, just look at the lengths of some of the infoboxes and the lengths of their articles in the list of Characters page. Depite their length, most of which contain quite vague information about the characters, Candace and Linda being the only exceptions. These articles are growing daily as this series is yet to complete its second season and a third even longer season is planned. While I have found a way to condense the infoboxes, the articles I cannot do anything about. Rhatsa26X (talk) 02:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

They will not get their own pages unless they have good reception. Just look at Phineas Flynn's article as an example. Almost every sentence is referenced. It is about to become a Good Article. Think about how you would make someone else's page look exactly like that. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 12:21, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

You know there is such a thing as overkill referencing, Phineas Flynn is such an example. For such a small article, it has nearly 40 references, and contains very vague information on the character that only watching the show will provide. Besides information is probably available for most of these characters, if anybody is willing to find it. Don't shrug it off until you try and don't remove information that can be verified by those who watch the show. This is NOT a Dictionary. Rhatsa26X (talk) 22:00 (UTC) / 18:00 (CDT), 19 October 2009

What are you talking about? His article has loads of information on his character. Just look at the "Character" section. Also, no, Wikipedia is not a Dictionary, but it is an Encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not an episode plot guide, and does not need excessive information on what Candice or Linda did in the future. Half of this article should be deleted. Most of this wouldn't even survive on a Wikia. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 23:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Rhatsa, I believe you need to brush up on WP policy. There is no such thing as having too much refs. In fact, every article on Wikipedia is supposed to be referenced. This isn't a fan site - character articles are supposed to contain out-of-universe material and not just fictional biographies. I'd suggest reading WP:MOS and the policies listed at WP:TV. The Flash ^{talk} 02:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

This is becoming ludicrous people. All this started with what amounts to a simple request, but has been blown to the lengths of stupidity worthy of Doofenscmirtz himself. There was relevent information on the character page but someone wiped it out again, not only my work but many other's as well. It seems I am only getting this flak on this particular show when I have helped out with many others (i.e. Star Trek, Tiny Toon Adventures, Eureka, and many others) as well as started almost a thousand articles, both fiction and nonfiction, with only a handfull of problems, mainly early on. An explanation of what I do seems in order: Most of what I do is create the bare bones of an article, a stub if you will, so other Wikipedians can expand on what is there. Then I generaly tag the article with whatever group the article pertains to (i.e. WikiProject Television or WikiProject Indiana, which I am a member) and let that group take over the affairs and writing of that article. I seldomly get involved in the page after that. This page has become a very exceptional example. Although I didn't start the article, I did contribute heavily to it as ell as many others and most of the contibutions have been deleted.

So I will look for the information myself and start these articles myself. I plan to start this project in a couple of days with Ferb Fletcher and Candace Flynn. I will be against trying to delete it without trying to add to them, making them worthy of Wikipedia.

I don't like having to sound forceful but if not only does no one listen but make excuses and accusations, it becomes pointless to reason so
Discussion Closed: Any future discussion on this matter will now be discussed on the new character pages in a couple of days.
Rhatsa26X (talk) 22:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Do not create those pages without reception or they will be redirected to this article. Wikipedia has a Notablity policy and doesnt allow articles for just anything. They have to be notable subjects referenced by Reliable Sources. Unless you find reception for these characters(Look at Phineas Flynn#Reception for an example) then these characters are not notable enough for a separate page. Also please remember what I said before. This article or any separate character article should not exist to tell everything the characters have done, and shouldn't consist of all "episode plot info". They should just describe the character's... character! _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 01:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Also, there's no fact that no one else wants to bother and do this - I've already been working on it. You're not listening to the clear fact that the rules state without sources for everything, the page will be deleted/redirected. It's policy, just listen to that, please. If you're going to create the page, source everything and focus on the production info and a lot less on the biography. This really is just the rules. The Flash ^{talk} 22:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Well I tend to get to this page through just typing Ferb. Also when considering notability, Phineas and Ferb was recognized along with SpongeBob as far as current cartoon shows. I think there maybe enough here to pull them out to their own article. 70.165.110.211 (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

The characters will definitely be notable, but only if production and/or reception is put in them. That's simply all it needs — plus refs of course — to sustain an article without getting reverted. The Flash ^{talk} 20:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Antagonist

Could Candace be considered the series main antagonist? I mean she bugs Phineas and Ferb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.198.251.170 (talk) 13:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Candace does help the boys in a few episodes, could Dr. Doofenshmirtz be the antagonist? Then again, maybe this TV show doesn't really need an antagonist. BelieVerr (talk) 20:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I know. but usually, she's out to get them and seems to be pyschotic. doesn't that qualify? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.198.251.170 (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Issues

I added extra tags, primarily becasue most of the character summaries are too long. For example, how is...

Phineas Flynn (voiced by Vincent Martella) is the protagonist of the series. Voiced by Vincent Martella and created and designed by Dan Povenmire, Phineas first appeared along with the rest of the series' main characters in the pilot episode "Rollercoaster." Phineas, along with his stepbrother Ferb Fletcher, star in each A-Plot of every episode. He appears to be 10 years old, though his age has never been directly confirmed. In one episode it is nearly confirmed he is 11. but this is not yet confimed. Phineas is a friendly and creative boy, inspired to make the summer as great as it can be by coming up with ideas for unusual, exciting, huge, and sometimes impossible activities from things of his everyday life: from TV commercials to random conversation topic. Phineas is also shown to have a wide array of musical abilities such as singing and songwriting and can play many different instruments. His stepbrother, Ferb, is his partner in their activities. He loves his sister Candace, generally being kind and friendly towards her, and often tries to please or help her, by putting her face on Mount Rushmore for her birthday, making her tree house better, or helping her learn how to drive. However, unwittingly, he usually accidentally upsets her with his schemes. He has a normal relationship with his mom and his stepdad. He often wonders about the whereabouts of his pet platypus Perry, unaware of his pet's double life. He is very nice to his friends. He also seems to be generally unaware that what he does might upset his parents. He appears to have a large crush on Isabella much like she has a large crush on him. The best instance in which Phineas showed he had a secret crush on Isabella was in the episode "The Chronicles of Meap Parts 1 and 2". When Phineas made a Cute Tracker, Isabella insisted that the interference was her. Phineas said it couldn't be her; it was later revealed that he had pre-programmed her cute-level into the the tracker so it wouldn't interfere, which lead Phineas to tell Isabella (indirectly) that she is the cutest thing/person in the world. Another time Phineas showed his crush for Isabella, was when he invited her onto a romantic cruise with him, from "That sinking feeling" A recurring theme is when people ask if he is too young to be working on his current project, to which he almost always responds, "Yes, yes I am." with pure honesty. It is noticed he could be ambidextrous because in the episode "Don't Even Blink" he plays guitar left-handed and right-handed. Phineas is also a little bit naive. In the original story pitch, it is said that Phineas is 9. However, Povenmire later stated that he and Ferb are "less than 15". In some episodes of Phineas and Ferb, Phineas is shown with blue eyes and, some episodes he is seen with black eyes. His catchphrase is "Ferb, I know what we're gonna do today". Another one of his catchphrases is "Hey, where's Perry?".

...meant to be a concise and accurate summary of the contents of Phineas Flynn? Instead it appears to be a rather rambling unreferenced plot summary --Pontificalibus (talk) 00:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Well I pruned it a bit... --Pontificalibus (talk) 13:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Yah, lists like this aren't big enough to tell everything they did. They are for describing their character. Who they are and what they do. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I am new to wiki, but I tried to fix many issues on the page. see what you people think. Thanks! (talk)74.197.245.253 (talk) 01:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 01:22, 8 April 2010

Organization Without a Cool Acronym

When was that name stated? I may have just missed the episode, or maybe its a not-yet-aired one, but i don't remember that name ever being stated in the series. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TVtriviagirl (talk • contribs) 04:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

It was mentioned in Phineas and Ferb: Summer Belongs To You! Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 16:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

"Candace Flynn" article

Shouldn't Candace get her own article like Phineas, Ferb, Perry, and Doof? I mean, she IS a main character. --66.206.126.189 (talk) 14:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree, as long there are citations, we should also think one for Isabella, Linda, and Monogram as they have been in at least 75 episodes.69.228.210.138 (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

(Straight from WP:Notability) - :Wikipedia covers notable topics - those that are "worthy of notice" and have been "noticed" to a significant degree by the world at large. A topic that is suitable for inclusion and has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." The characters you have mentioned, that have articles, are notable because of this. Just look at their articles, and think "Could I find this stuff for so and so character?" They could possibly be able to have articles. We just need somebody to go out and find the information(from good sources). _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 02:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I was gonna edit this: candace wanted a break, but phineas and ferb can do better than her, only with helping. she would mostly get humiliated by them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.241.244 (talk) 03:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Candace's section goes off-topic

In the first paragraph, it goes off-topic "..., but in one episode she bust her two younger brothers after then she regret when she already bust her two brothers, before the episode ended it reveals that it is just Candace's dream, after then it reveal's as Perry' dream". This article is suppose to describe characters, not episodes. Should this be removed? --Hadger 23:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Adding approved images for the characters?

Should we put fan-style or TV-screen images of the characters so the viewer knows what they looks like for the characters except Phineas, Ferb, Candace, Linda, Lawrence, and Perry? What are your opinions? Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 02:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Thoughts about this?

Should we form Project PnF to have this page turned into a featured article and make all other PnF-realated pages (Ashley Tisdale, Alyson Stoner, Phineas Flynn, e.t.c.) to featured articles, but start at this page since it is in the worst condition? Ideas, thoughts, anything? Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 00:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

I think maybe a Task Force under WikiProject Disney is more appropriate. JDDJS (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

A project focusing on the series started up a few weeks ago, so forget about what you said, and no, no, I didn't create it either. Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 03:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Character sections

Is it me, or does listing the characters according to the number of episodes they appear in just sound weird? I mean "Characters that are in at least 75 episodes"? Isn't that the same as "Main Characters"? I tried to revert it to that and fix all the sections like that, but someone reverted it back. 24.185.165.70 (talk) 15:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

No one make modifications I did to the Candace section.

When I read that Candace was the main antagonist in the series, I thought to myself, "she is not an antagonist." So I started getting concerned and added, "though she is not viewed as an antagonist." Candace is more like Squidward from SpongeBob. And she is also a lot like Plankton from that show, though she isn't evil. Doofenshmirtz is the main antagonist, not Candace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.183.4 (talk) 05:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't think she should be listed as an antagonist at all. --Confession0791 (talk) 06:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

i think she is. the antagonist is angaisnt the main characters and phineas and ferb are the main characters., and since she hates them and is agaisnt htem she is the antagonist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.153.215.175 (talk) 02:02, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

How does she hate them? Several episodes indicate the opposite. It seems like she's just worried about them doing dangerous things, annoyed that they repeatedly get away with it, frustrated at how powerless she is to stop them, and desperate to prove to her mother that she's not psychotic. Storylinewise, though, she is often pitted against her brothers, so she may be an antagonist in that sense.

POV Candace Flynn

We need to establish whether or not Candace is an antagonist. I always thought of Doofenshmirtz as the main antagonist. Btw, she does not hate her brothers. Confession0791 (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2010

sure. trying to pull your brothers face off means she doesnt hate them. yeah right.

Not if you think your brother's face is really a mask worn by his friend (I'm assuming that's the episode you're referring to). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.0.17.254 (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

My thought: I have seen all 107 episodes that have aired worldwide and Candace has attempted to bust her brothers less than Doofenshritz. The only episodes where there is no Doof plan are "Isabella and the Temple of Sap"( he wasn't in it due to it being Poofenlpotz and Pinky), "Traffic Cam Caper"(Perry only went there to barrow Norm to destroy a video camera at the OWCA), "Get that Bigfoot Outta my Face!"( he was only waiting for a women at a house in the country near Camp Phineas and Ferb), and "Oh, There you are, Perry"(the main villian was the Regurgiator). Candace didn't bust her brothers in "Candace Losees Her Head"(the plan was for Candace on Mt. Rushmore), "Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror", "Flop Starz"(originally were going to bust them, but changed her mind thanks to Stacy and Jeremy), "Lights, Candace, Action!", "Get that Bigfoot Outta my Face!", "Mom's Birthday", "The Ballad of Badbeard", "Dude, We're getting the Band Back Together", "Ready for the Bettys", "The Best Lazy Day Ever"(The boys never built anything), "Put that Putter Away"(Stacy was suppose to bust the boys, but got caught in the fun), "Unfair Science Fair", "Hail Doofinia!", need to go on? Score Doof:4, Candace:12(season 1 alone). therefore Candace is the secondary one, Doof in the main one. Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 02:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I agree to that and have changed it. If there are no objections, it's settled. --Confession0791 (talk) 03:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

i object! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.153.215.175 (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Candace is not a antagonist by any means. Doof is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.170.220.15 (talk) 02:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Uh, yeah she is. Haven't you taken english class yet? The protagonist is the main character. Phineas is the protagonist. Ferb is the dueteragonist. The antagonist is the character agaisnt the protagonist and dueteragonist. Candace is agaisnt Phineas and Ferb and since they are the main characters, Candace IS by all means the main antagonist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.153.216.212 (talk) 21:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

No, she's not. Only Candace haters would think that. The show has 4 main charectors, which are featured in the 2 main plots, and Candace is one of them. She is not a bad guy, or "villain" by any means. There are quite a few episodes where she has a non-antagonsitic role, and not just the ones where she doesn't try to bust the boys. She could be a secondary antagonists by not the MAIN one. We had a discussion about this over on the P&F wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.170.220.15 (talk) 01:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Ballpit kid-Farmer and wife

I really don't feel these characters should be under recurring characters. These characters never have actually played any role at all in the plot. They do not appear in roles other than cameo. Just because there in many episodes does mean they can't be minor characters, especially when considering they never even give them names. JDDJS (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Ballpit kid has been in more episodes than all of the other recurring and minor cast, except for Vanessa. The farmer and wife have spoke in every episode they have been seen, so it needs to be moved back due to this reason so there is not confusion on where the sections fall at. Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 22:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

I won't argue about farmer and wife. But I have seen almost every episode of the show and I have no idea who the ballpit kid is. Just beacuse he appears in a lot of episodes doesn't mean he's not a minor character. He has not played any role in any episode other then just a random cameo. JDDJS (talk) 16:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

The ballpit kid is a character who has saw Perry in I was a Middle-Aged Robot and had the best lemonade(in his POV) in The Lemonade Stand. Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 19:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't feel he is a recurring character, but if you show that other editors agree with you, I won't stop him from being moved. JDDJS (talk) 16:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

One episode characters

Do we really need to include characters that only appear in one episode? JDDJS (talk) 23:29, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Characters

Isabella is absent many episodes and often plays minor roles. Monogram only appears in one scene per episode. I can understand why Monogram is a a main character so I'll let that one stay. However, Isabella is simply a secondary character. She has too many episode absents and too many minor roles. JDDJS (talk) 03:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't think either of them should be major characters. Phineas, Ferb, Candace, Perry, and Doofenshmirtz are the main characters. Also, I think the whole "Minor characters" section should be removed. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 03:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Assuming you intentionally left her out, I feel that Linda should also be considered a main character. She is in almost every episode, and she plays pretty significant roles in the episodes. About Monogram, I agree with but I was willing to compromise. On the minor character sections, if you want to realist them under recurring characters thats fine, but most of them do belong in the article. --JDDJS (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

So you are saying that there are like 3 groups of 2 main charaters? Phineas and Ferb, Candace and Mom, and Perry and Doofenshmirtz? idk, Maybe. I just think a line needs to be drawn somewhere for MAIN characters. About the "Minor characters", the only notable one is the baby head because it has mention in an interview and actually appears in more then 2 episodes. The rest definitely have no place on Wikipedia. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 03:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Farmer and Wife are also notable because they have reappeared in several episodes. The OWCA should probably be included on account that they are important to the story line. Albert is potentially notable because he appeared in 3 episodes and played a major role in 2 of those episodes. ==JDDJS (talk) 04:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

The OWCA is not a character, and can probably be described in Major Monogram's section. The other characters do not appear enough to be a real "reoccurring character". They are not important to helping the reader understand the series. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 13:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm fine with OWCA being merged into Monogram's and Perry's sections but I do feel Farmer and wife should be included somewhere. If not here then perhaps mention it as a recurring joke on the main Phineas Ferb page. JDDJS (talk) 01:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you can make a “Minor characters” paragraph talking about some of the smaller reoccurring joke characters. Instead of a whole section with each character listed. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 02:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

That is perfectly fine with me--JDDJS (talk) 04:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Fireside girls troop number

In the article the troop is given two different numbers: 246329 (Isabella's section) and 46231 (Fireside girls). Both have a comment reading "DO NOT CHANGE THIS, ISABELLA GOOFED UP IN "ISABELLA AND THE TEMPLE OF SAP".", which cannot be correct in both cases. According to the series' Wikia [1], the correct one is 46231, and Isabella's mistake was saying 46321, instead. I've checked the temple of SAP and it says 231. If someone has access to any of the chapters in which the correct troop number is mentioned, please, fix this info. Elideb (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

That is correct---208.102.190.137 (talk) 23:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

It should be 46231. 69.228.199.187 (talk) 03:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Unverified race

There is no reason within Wikipedia's policies to accept this edit. You can reinstate the information if you find a reliable source (see WP:RS) for the information. JDDJS, you just successfully clinched a bunch of socks whose master tried to circumvent WP policies; you of all editors here should know what the guidelines are. It may seem trivial to you that I would remove precisely that information, but look at the tags on the page: it has to start somewhere. Get to work, find a reference, or acquiesce yourself to the fact that, as it says below this edit screen I'm looking at, "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." Don't go to war over this. Drmies (talk) 00:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

• Here is another one. I am not going to revert it, even though it is still weaselish and now ungrammatical to boot (comma error)--and, most importantly, it is original research. You should really take Wikipedia:No original research to heart. Drmies (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Read the plot summary of the episode Phineas and Ferb's Quantum Boogaloo, which by the way is a WP:Good Article JDDJS (talk) 00:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)(edit conflict):Watch the episode Picture This. There is a Mexican Jewish Festival in the episode. There is a lot of original research on this page, but this is not one because it can be proven by watching the show. I have done many edits to help this page and have added many references, but this show is a kids show and therefor there are only so many references to add. There are certain things that the episodes should just service. JDDJS (talk) 00:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

No, I don't have to read the plot summary: Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia. That there is such a festival, by the way, doesn't mean that some character is of that racial persuasion. (You could, of course, cite the source cited in that article, if there is one. If there isn't, it shouldn't be a GA.) And no, I am not going to watch the episode: there is a football game on TV tonight. Moreover, it wouldn't help, since even if you and I agree on what the show shows it's still original research. I appreciate what you have done for the article, but at some point you have to realize that you can only go as far as the (secondary and tertiary) references will allow: that's what it means to write a decent encyclopedia. The service Wikipedia should provide is not detailing every little unverified detail about something. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

I don't get it. What is a better source than the actual show? It's not like it is just implied, it is specifically said in several episodes. Here's a source that may not be the best but at least it's something [2] JDDJS (talk) 00:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:No original research, and WP:PRIMARY. IMDB is generally not regarded as a reliable source. Please have a look; it will explain some of my comments. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

See WP:IGNORE JDDJS (talk) 22:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Is it actually said other then the fact that she went to a festival? If it is stated, then you can cite the episode. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 23:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

what the bleck is going on here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.40.121.4 (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Jenny

She appeared in Candace Gets Busted. 69.228.90.50 (talk) 01:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Carl, the Intern

A couple of changes I would recommend - change video tapping to videotaping. Also interviewed is one word. Carl, the Intern (Tyler Alexander Mann), is Major Monogram's young intern in charge of video tapping Monogram when he is being inter viewed. He is a bit careless, wears glasses, and sometimes forgets to focus the camera correctly.

H2mac — Preceding unsigned comment added by H2mac (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

In-Universe Overhaul

I was merely passing by this article for another purpose and noticed major cleanup needed (punctuation, tense, and fragmentation just to name a few), but most of all obvious is the in-universe autobiography style. For instance, feeling the need to mention specific patches FSG received for one event or placing two different FSG troop numbers between sections because a character accidentally gave the wrong number in a single instance seems inappropriate as such minor in-detail universes. The entire article needs a major overhaul. The question is, where to start? — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 17:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey I've been trying my best to clean it up but it's not easy. You should see how it use to be [3]. An editor created several socks to try to restore that version. I've been trying to find sources to add more out of universe info, but it's not easy. Feel free to try to clean it up. --JDDJS (talk) 19:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Wow, that was pretty bad. Naturally, I appreciate the effort (again, I only stumbled here; I had not expected so much work would need to be done.) In cases like this I just prefer to have some sort of game plan even if I jump in an do a major edit. That way maybe it won't revert to the hodgepodge that it looks like now. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 20:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Fireside Girls

The troop number is 46321 NOT 46231

WRong. 69.228.91.99 (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Nope your wrong about the troop # It's 46231 NOT 46321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.205.242 (talk) 20:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Candace Flynn grammatical mistake?

I can't edit it for some reason, but it says Candace is their fifteenth-year-old sister, where it should only have fifteen-year-old. Please change!

Too lazy to log into my wiki account

Slash not included in celebrities

Even though he appeared in Kick It Up A Notch, his name does not appear in the article. You can find proof at the following link: [4]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.38.244.81 (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Kelly Clarkson

Was in Family Christmas, should be added to the page. 69.228.91.99 (talk) 02:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 17 March 2012

218.186.109.169 (talk) 10:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Request doesn't contain anything to change. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 13:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 June 2012

Please change the fireside girl troop number 46231 to 46321 because the shows that mention it have Isabella saying "We're Fireside troop 46321"

Doubled01 (talk) 23:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done: It seems that that was a mistake - Error: In "Isabella and the Temple of Sap", Isabella mistakenly lists the troop number as 46321 instead of 46231. - phineasandferb Wikia ^Avic_ennasis @ 07:02, 16 Sivan 5772 / 07:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

This is also confirmed by the creators. 75.111.18.181 (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Candace Flynn

In the sentence "Candace does not approve of the inventions her brothers create, and during each episode she attempts to "bust her brothers" by showing their mom." it says she attempts to bust her brothers during each episode but in a few episodes she does not try to such as ""Sci-Fi Pie Fly". — Preceding unsigned comment added by XapApp (talk • contribs) 11:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Baljeet

Isn't Baljeet's last name Rai? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.117.101.254 (talk) 03:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Secondary Character listing

Shouldn't the Secondary characters page have them ordered by major to most important instead of having them in alphabetical order. DisneyGirlovestacos95 (talk) 19:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

No because it is too debatable who plays the most important roles. In order to avoid POV issues, it is easier to just list them alphabetical. JDDJS (talk) 03:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

But that makes people who seen the show alot more confused with the character listing. Besides having Baljeet in front of the secondary characters just doesn't work, and Isabella in some certain episodes (and i mean some episodes not all) did help the boys on some of the things their doing today. Look that's just my preference i just think it will be just weird having the character list alphabetically so i suggest it stays to how i put them. DisneyGirlovestacos95 (talk) 21:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Why should it stay the way you want them? In my opinion, Linda has a much bigger role than Isabella, but it is just that, my opinion. By listing them alphabetically, there is no longer any issues of WP:POV. Unless you can determine a way to objectively determine which characters play more important roles, or you get consensus to change it, leave it as alphabetical order. JDDJS (talk) 14:59, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Okay firstly I never asked anything my way, secondly you shouldn't remove a bulletin notice above something that shouldn't be change or already put on already and third and final time to end this subject look at every known page with listing of characters or names of cast do all of them have them alphabetically? No only a certain number of them do and firstly this is the last time i delt with this whole fiasco with reverting the edits i work hard on, end of story! DisneyGirlovestacos95 (talk) 02:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

" Look that's just my preference i just think it will be just weird having the character list alphabetically so i suggest it stays to how i put them." That is saying that it should be your way, and WP:ILIKEIT. "edits i work hard on" One, that is irrelevant and borderline WP:OWNERSHIP. Two, I have worked a lot harder on this page than you have. I have cleared many of the issues that this article had; one of the biggest issues was that it was written from a fan's POV. "look at every known page with listing of characters or names of cast do all of them have them alphabetically? No only a certain number of them do" One, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Two, in some series it is more clear which characters play bigger roles, so they do not have to be alphabetically listed. With Phineas and Ferb, it is a matter of opinion which secondary characters play the biggest roles. My actiond have been based in policy, you have not even attempted to bring up any policies that suggest otherwise. So unless you can find an objective way of sorting them, or consensus forms against me, it stays alphabetically and I will report you if you try to change it. JDDJS (talk) 15:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

You still don't understand, I don't care whether you have it your way or you're the boss. But to be honest, you just have no interest about casting list on cast members on a tv show or character listing. And if you say that I'm the cause for everyting I it's not me it's you. And FYI certain characters from whether the shows are Phineas and Ferb, House, or MLP:FIM should be listed in order by who appears in some instances in the series, they never lie. If you don't agree with this then I'm moving on. DisneyGirlovestacos95 (talk) 00:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Recurring characters need to be reordered

The recurring characters section needs to be reordered. For recurring characters, it should either be by number of episodes appearnces or by order of character introduction. Personally, I would prefer the former, but I do not know how to determine the number of episode appearances. JDDJS (talk) 02:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I am thinking: Linda, Isabella, Baljeet, Buford, Jeremy, Carl, Stacy, Fireside Girls. fsdkfhsdfh 04:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

I am talking about recurring characters, not secondary. JDDJS (talk) 15:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 2 January 2013

I would like to say that in Phineas and Ferb's "List of Characters" there is a sentence that says, "..like other characters, Phineas' age isn't mentioned..." yet I have indeed seen in the show that each characters age is in fact mentioned. Don't get me wrong, you'd have to watch Phineas and Ferb a lot to know this. But in the show it says they are 10 (yet I would check for more details to see on the show if this is true). Thank you!

Littlesparkle2002 (talk) 04:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC) --Littlesparkle2002 (talk) 04:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Littlesparkle2002

I do watch a lot of Phineas and Ferb and I know they have never said their ages. If you can provide a source in which they clearly state that they are 10, then I will change it. JDDJS (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

"Promoted characters

Should Linda, Monogram, Isabella, and Jeremy be added to the "main characters"? And shouldn't Irving and Django be in the "secondary charcters?" This is so confusing how one person totally switched up the roles. This is what I think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.37.133 (talk) 22:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Only the first 3 COULD be moved if wanted, the rest is a no. 75.111.52.129 (talk) 05:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 August 2014

Aloyse von Roddenstein

Aloyse von Roddenstein (voiced by Joe Orrantia), or Rodney for short, is a mad scientist and Doofenshmirtz's rival. He is always trying best himself out on Doofenshmirtz on doing evil, believing him to be a disappointment in doing villainy. However, Rodney often fails either due to Doofenshmirtz's antics or to Perry's interventions. He is a member of the villain organization L.O.V.E.M.U.F.F.I.N., in which Doofenshmirtz founded, and similar to Doofenshmirtz, Rodney would usually create his own inventions (known as -inizors) to serve his evil schemes. Rodney would later go on to serve as the primary antagonist of the episode special "Phineas and Ferb Save Summer", where he learns that Doofenshmirtz has successfully moved the Earth away from the Sun with his latest -inator. To that end, Rodney leads L.O.V.E.M.U.F.F.I.N. into capturing all of O.W.C.A.'s agents while he builds himself an -inizor (which is just 10 times the size and strength of Doof's inator) that will move the Earth further away into a new Ice Age. As soon he reveals this to the public, everyone is horrified, even Doofenshmirtz strongly opposes. During the climax, Rodney attempts to move the Earth away into a new Ice Age, but a disgusted Doofenshmirtz defeats him and destroys the -inizor (with the help from Perry, Monogram, Carl, and Monty). In the end of the special, Rodney is arrested and taken away into O.W.C.A. custody to face trial for his crimes against humanity. Phily52 (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- ferret (talk) 18:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Vanessa's style

Vanessa Doofenshmirtz [...] dresses in a goth style.

Dressing in black does not make her goth. (White makeup? Black hair dye?) I'd be surprised to learn that she was not conceived as a junior Emma Peel. —Tamfang (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

And yet, in "Hail Doofania" when Candace gets Vanessa's duds by mistake, all the girls say "goth". And Vanessa's boudoir's décor is rather gothy. —Tamfang (talk) 09:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

In "Brain Drain" Vanessa tells her father that her friends are not Visigoths, not even Goths, but Punks. —Tamfang (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Why was the character Vanessa Doofenshmirtz created with a curvy body? (He is villan assistent at first asppearence); Goth Girls of Cartoons (He is sarcastic, but not looks like goth); Here about meeting with Disney about divorsed Doof family; Here Dan Powenmair stated in 2009 that Phineas and Vanessa will be pair. Sorry for my english.--Gplover (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2016

I'm too bad at English to edit the article, but I can add links to sources that I find while editing this article in Russian. In the Russian part of Wikipedia, I am a member with patrol rights, and I am the author of good article. Gplover (talk) 06:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 23:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Ferb's nationality

Wouldn't it be better and more specific to say Ferb's from England? Gundersonian (talk) 01:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2016

In the subsection about Admiral Acronym, Major Monogram is spelled wrong.

Adfun12345 (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Done MeowMoon (talk) 01:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of Phineas and Ferb characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090403200941/http://www.stylinonline.com/youth-t-shirt-disney-phineas-ferb.html to http://www.stylinonline.com/youth-t-shirt-disney-phineas-ferb.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100722044630/http://www.awn.com/articles/production/swampy-dan-emerges-iphineas-and-ferbi/page/1 to http://www.awn.com/articles/production/swampy-dan-emerges-iphineas-and-ferbi/page/1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090917004615/http://www.whattheyplay.com/products/phineas-and-ferb-ds-for-nintendo-ds/ to http://www.whattheyplay.com/products/phineas-and-ferb-ds-for-nintendo-ds/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Phineas and Ferb characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607055650/http://www.tampabay.com/features/parenting/article993119.ece to http://www.tampabay.com/features/parenting/article993119.ece
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091006022432/http://www.tampabay.com/features/parenting/article993119.ece to http://www.tampabay.com/features/parenting/article993119.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 June 2018

Can you please add another minor character? The character is Marty the Rabbit Boy and his Musical Blender. Can you please add this character to the Minor Characters section? Please. 2602:304:5D47:FFD9:5835:A923:C50A:D33E (talk) 01:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 09:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Character sections

Instead of having the characters mixed and only divided into "Secondary" and "Recurrent", wouldn't it be better to divide them by types as I show Here for a better navigation? --BrookTheHumming (talk) 20:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 1 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) B dash (talk) 03:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

---

List of Phineas and Ferb characters → List of Phineas and Ferb and Milo Murphy's Law characters – Milo Murphy's Law was presented from the outset as being set in the same fictional universe as Phineas and Ferb, in fact in and around the same area and set after the events of the original series; Milo Murphy's Law character Melissa Chase is retroactively established as being one of the onlooking bystanders in the first episode of Phineas and Ferb, explained as having a fear of rollercoasters as a result. In the first season finale of Milo Murphy's Law, the character of Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz shows up, the more typical Phineas and Ferb crossover episode being the second season premiers. After this crossover, the characters of Doofenshmirtz, Perry the Platypus, Major Monogram and Carl joined the cast of Milo Murphy's Law on a permanent basis, in a recurring capacity for all except Doofenshmirtz, whose capacity is a supporting to borderline main one. Since then, even minor characters from Phineas and Ferb, such as Jeremy Johnson, have appeared in the occasional episode of Milo Murphy's Law. Given characters' story arcs are being continued from Phineas and Ferb, it makes the most sense to have both character pages be one, rather than having character information split across two pages once Milo Murphy's Law would have received its own individual page. This marks what the combined page would look like. Thank you. MacCready (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

• Note. See Phineas and Ferb and Milo Murphy's Law. – wbm1058 (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose Different TV series shouldn't have their character lists merged even is there are some crossovers. Keep this separate. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose Unnecessary and would make this article too long. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 20:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose. The overlap isn't enough for me to suggest creating such a potentially convoluted article. This would be like putting List of The Cleveland Show characters in the Family Guy article. Nohomersryan (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose Per Geraldo Perez's reason. Thissecretperson (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2020

I would like to add some other minor characters such as the Inexplicable Giant Floating Baby Head, Agent W, Evil Carl, Peter the Panda, Director Diphthong, 2D Characters, The Johnsons, Star Wars-Themed Characters, Hulkjeet, That one chef from Ferb TV, Ancient Chinese-Themed Characters, Stone Age Flynn-Fletchers, Mrs. Thompson, The Regurgitator, the Bug Trio, Harry the Hyena, Maggie the Macaw, Karen the Cat, Agent D, Prof. Parenthesis, Mecha-Fleas, etc. Prof. Pedantic (talk) 23:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Can I make articles on Phineas and Ferb Secondary Characters?

I want to make the articles on the Phineas and Ferb secondary articles then move them here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anilgaming2007 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Can I add the 2nd dimension characters to the page?

Is it allowed if I put the second dimension characters in the wikipedia page or should I create an article for the list of characters in the 2nd dimension?Anilgaming2007 (talk) 00:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 August 2020

Please let me edit the phineas and Ferb 223.229.232.237 (talk) 04:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 05:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022

More pictures, or nobody will tell who you're talking about! Man of wikis (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: We can't include copyrighted images. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 April 2023

Can you please fix the section for Vanessa Doofenshmirtz? She first appeared in "The Magnificent Few" (both airing and production), not "Tree to Get Ready". Can you please fix that? Please. 2601:40A:8400:5A40:10CE:DC12:EB3E:F5F2 (talk) 21:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Actualcpscm (talk) 09:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Can you please look up the episode "The Magnificent Few" on the Phineas and Ferb fandom wiki? It shows that Vanessa first appeared in "The Magnificent Few", not "Tree to Get Ready". You can watch "The Magnificent Few" as well. 2601:40A:8400:5A40:570:CC21:412:96C7 (talk) 12:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

"Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention!" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention! until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)