Talk:List of all-time WNBA win–loss records

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
	This article is supported by the Women's basketball task force.

National Basketball Association: WNBA Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WNBA task force.

Women's sport: Basketball / WNBA Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's basketball task force.
	This article is supported by the WNBA task force.

A fact from List of all-time WNBA win–loss records appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Los Angeles Sparks have the most wins and highest winning percentage in WNBA history?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of all-time WNBA win–loss records.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Los Angeles Sparks have the most wins and highest winning percentage in WNBA history? Source: https://www.basketball-reference.com/wnba/teams/
- ALT1: ... that after never qualifying for the playoffs, the Portland Fire folded with the lowest winning percentage in WNBA history? Source: https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/32115379/ranking-best-wnba-franchises-history-seattle-storm-minnesota-lynx-no-1-overall and https://www.basketball-reference.com/wnba/teams/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Exometeorology Soulbust (talk) 01:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Comment: ~~QPQ to be done soon.~~

Created by Soulbust (talk). Self-nominated at 04:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/List of all-time WNBA win–loss records; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Soulbust: Good article. Just need a QPQ. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Onegreatjoke: QPQ done now. Thank you for your help with reviews! Soulbust (talk) 01:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

QPQ checks out, ticking per Onegreatjoke's original review. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 18:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic