Talk:List of hentai creators
Latest comment: 13 years ago by TheFarix in topic Whiting Out
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Qwaiiplayer (talk · contribs) on 8 June 2021 with the comment: Unsourced original research that fails WP:NLIST It was contested by Godsy (talk · contribs) on 11 June 2021 with the comment: deprod -- this has been around since 04; several iterations have had sources, but none of them appear to be good offhand. I would not be surprised if someone more experienced with the topic could fairly easily provide a good source given the opportunity, e.g. if this goes to a deletion discussion. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Why is the title "H authors"?
editWhy is the title of this article "List of H authors" and not "List of hentai authors"? Unless someone gives me a compelling reason within a few days, I'm going to effect the appropriate change of article name. --Cyde 05:30, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
old but: because this includes eroge, which come under the broad sweeping japanese use of the letter H referring to not-suitable-for-children material, not necessarily Hentai.
Whiting Out
editWhy was 75% of the list whited out? If there is a conflict with the definition of hentai, follow the link. Alucardbarnivous (talk) 01:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Entries that did not have stand-alone articles were removed under WP:REDLINK, WP:WTAF, and most impotently WP:LISTPEOPLE. I'll also note that none of the remaining entries are
sourcednot sourced, so the list may be subject to deletion as a violation of WP:BLP. —Farix (t | c) 01:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- You're free to take whatever action you wish. Administrators have been notified of the issue and hopefully a consensus can be reached in the matter. Alucardbarnivous (talk) 01:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- The burden of evidence that any one entries is valid is on the editors who wishes to add or restore it. If you have no interest in finding sources for any of the entries to establish their notability and inclusion, then an administrator isn't going to intervene on your behalf. —Farix (t | c) 01:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- You're free to take whatever action you wish. Administrators have been notified of the issue and hopefully a consensus can be reached in the matter. Alucardbarnivous (talk) 01:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)