Talk:List of social nudity places in North America

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Massachusettsan in topic Former naturist locations

listings of locales

edit

Why list a coffee place in Miami in between Hawaii and Illinois?

Ellesmere Island must be someone's idea of a joke. That far north even the peak summer temperature is too cold for nudism to be practical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.162.98 (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removed Okracoke from list of nude beaches

edit

All beaches on the outer banks are part of the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, a federal park. There is no nudity allowed on any beach on Okracoke, or in the vicinity. You might be able to get away with it and not get caught due to the remoteness, but it is illegal. Including it in the list of places where "nudity is allowed" is misleading and incorrect. Then I will have to cite you for "public Indecency". The fact that you read it on Wiki and are a tourist who didn't know any better isn't a legal defense. "No nudity. There are no nude beaches on the Outer Banks." ~ Cape Hatteras National Park Service publication.


moved from talk

edit
  • Privacy Campground in Hancock contains a nude sunbathing area and permits skinny dipping. NO IT DOESN'T! Along with many signs saying NO DOGS, this lovely campground says NO NUDISTS at the entrance. Please note.

-PetraSchelm (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

States of the US

edit

The list within the United States is incomplete. Several of the states are listed as 'nudity is illegal' or something like that. But I counted sixteen states (including Delaware, Georgia, Rhode Island, and Wyoming) that are NOT in the list. What is the nudity status of these sixteen states? Also, what about the District of Columbia? hello (talk) 08:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

It should be noted that under the Oregon State Constitution, public nudity is protected as freedom of expression. As a result, public social nudity takes place in numerous locations not given any official designation, since none is needed. In remote areas, it used to be the case that people swimming in clothes were regarded with suspicion, though this may have died out. Dismalscholar (talk) 03:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

New York state

edit

Only four places are listed for New York state. Only the first one has any links. Is the entire city of Ithaca allowing some nudity? Or is this still only limited to beaches? Is public nudity allowed anywhere in the capital district? hello (talk) 08:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Someone removed the Ithaca listing today along with some others. A quick Google of the mentioned "Potter's Falls" reveals a mixed bag of information. Some say skinydipping here is ok; others say no. Probably someone with local knowlege who knows where to find a definitive source is needed --Arg342 (talk) 01:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Topless?

edit

Places with only topless bathing is off-topic. They are not naturist. Naturist beach means that complete nudity is allowed. --Oddeivind (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would agree with this. The title and introduction of the article is fairly clear and would limit the scope. --Arg342 (talk) 13:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup

edit

I just placed a cleanup tag on this article. It has a significant number of red links and citations only to private clubs' own websites, and the article risks resembling a WP:DIRECTORY for private nudist and échangiste clubs, non-notable and notable alike. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is partly true. The article needs a lot of work, but I think it can be kept. I would suggest that the article could fall under the category of WP:LSC, specifically "Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group." The only reason it fails this at the moment is because of excess text makes it exceed the 32K guideline.
Most of the items on this list will not meet notability guidelines on their own. Considering the question "If this person/thing/etc., wasn't an X, would it reduce their fame or significance?", the answer for nearly all the places listed would be that they would have very little significance. However, because the list is short, the fact that they are a member of this list makes them somewhat notable.
Based on this, I would propose that for each listed item, contributors should always try to find find reliable third party sources per WP:SOURCES, in addition to the first party source already presented by most items on the list, so that Verifiability can be clearly established. If a place is not notable, it should not get redlinked. Normal standards should apply for neutrality, removing advertising copy, etc.--Arg342 (talk) 14:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Plagiarism!

edit

I would just like to point out that someone under the name of "Tyler Reeh" is selling a word-for-word copy of this Wikipedia article in the form of a Kindle e-book for $8.95 on Amazon. I know Wikipedia is public domain, but it seems like it still must be illegal for this person to be claiming authorship and profiting from the article without properly attributing it to Wikipedia.

Here is the link: "I WANT TO GET NAKED! Social Nudity Places in North America [Kindle Edition]"141.210.250.110 (talk) 00:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The link is now broken. Looks like the e-book has been removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.66.34.242 (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removed San Vicente Inn

edit

San Vicente Inn (Los Angeles) has new ownership and is no longer clothing-optional. "Jeff Klein, owner of the San Vicente Inn, laid out his plans to transform the dilapidated bungalows that make up the San Vicente’s properties into a swank urban inn."

http://www.wehoville.com/2014/02/12/latest-meeting-draws-support-neighbors-san-vicente-inn-project/

The operator at reservations phone line says that clothing-optional is not allowed any more. Jefft0 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Clark County, Washington

edit

Is public nudity in Clark County, Washington will ever be legalize — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.222.219.254 (talk) 08:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on List of social nudity places in North America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on List of social nudity places in North America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of social nudity places in North America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on List of social nudity places in North America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of social nudity places in North America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Only places with articles

edit

Since Wikipedia is not a directory I think we should follow the guidance at WP:LISTCRIT and only include items here that are notable. Otherwise, this is merely a collection of external links hidden as citations. Thoughts? --ZimZalaBim talk 21:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

No one seems to care. I'm going to start scrubbing listings that just are a link to their own website. General associations or public parks seem likely ok, but not just business operations. --ZimZalaBim talk 21:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Carolina Foothills Resort

edit

Carolina Foothills Resort should be moved from the North Carolina section to the South Carolina section. 2603:6080:30F0:7CA0:D891:87:7A84:65D6 (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Former naturist locations

edit

There are a lot of campgrounds and beaches listed here that are former naturist facilities that are now either closed or textile, and I was wondering how we feel about an overhaul of including those locations. I wouldn't mind so much if there was a more consistent format to indicate former locations, but a lack of consistency makes this page feel more disorganized than it already is. Does anyone have any thoughts of either a better way to designate former naturist locations or maybe just removing them altogether? Massachusettsan (talk) 22:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply