Talk:List of state universities in India

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Muhandes in topic Somebody pls change the following
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on List of state universities in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 55 external links on List of state universities in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Somebody pls change the following

edit

In the first summary table, please change the column heading from "Fit under Section 12 (B)?" to a more self-descriptive "Eligible for UGV grant (Sec-12B)?" or "UGV grant eligibility (Sec-12B)?" or even "UGV grant (Sec-12B)?". I had to scroll up and spend time figuring out what sec-12 means. Avoid such jargon and use encylopedic self-descriptive language. Take your pick. Thanks. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 18:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

The description of the table sits right above it. It says In the list below, the term "Section 12 (B)?" refers to being "declared fit to receive Central/UGC assistance under Section 12 (B) of the UGC Act–1956". Is this not clear enough? Can you suggest a clearer description? --Muhandes (talk) 18:31, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, No, not clear enough. Or else this discussion will not be needed. Column heading itself should be self-descriptive without fiddling around, here and there. Current convoluted way is not encylopedic enough. Besides too much jargon in the 2nd para of lead about "section this and that" should be simplified and moved to the notes. We must use get-to-the-point-direct encylopedic language without jargon. Go from A to B, without jumping from A to D, to Y, to B. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
I don't object. What did you mean by UGV? Will "UGC grant eligibility (Sec-12B)?" do it? --Muhandes (talk) 07:08, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
By the way, 202.156.182.84, you are quite active, maybe you would consider creating an account? I can't ping you when you are anonymous. --Muhandes (talk) 07:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply