Talk:List of unions affiliated with the AFL-CIO
A fact from List of unions affiliated with the AFL-CIO appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Web site linking
editProviding a link to every single union's Web site runs afoul of Wikipedia:External links in several ways. Under "Important points to remember," #2 says "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article." Under "Official links," "Minimize the number of links" concludes: "Wikipedia does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website. Wikipedia does not attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites. Complete directories lead to clutter and to placing undue emphasis on what the subject says." Additionally, it runs afoul of WP:LINKFARM and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. In other words, Wikipedia doesn't exist to be a way of finding AFL-CIO member union Web sites. Official sites exist to provide more information on the article. Linking to each union's site doesn't add information to the encyclopedia article discussing AFL-CIO membership criteria, or establish the number or names of member unions (one link to the AFl-CIO site does that). - Tim1965 (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, you appear to be correct. And since nearly every item on the list has an article, I can think of no argument for breaking the rule.RevelationDirect (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413143055/http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021727991_aporlongshorelockout1stldwritethru.html to http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021727991_aporlongshorelockout1stldwritethru.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110702095007/http://kcerds.dol-esa.gov/query/orgreport.do to http://kcerds.dol-esa.gov/query/orgReport.do
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050903070845/http://www.aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art03.cfm to http://aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art03.cfm
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050903070623/http://www.aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art10.cfm to http://aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art10.cfm
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050903070623/http://www.aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art10.cfm to http://aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art10.cfm
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050903070441/http://www.aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art04.cfm to http://aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art04.cfm
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050903070623/http://www.aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art10.cfm to http://aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art10.cfm
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050903070734/http://www.aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art11.cfm to http://aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/constitution/art11.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Affiliated unions by membership
editThere definitely should be a table of the 56 affiliated unions by membership. Any objections to that? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)