Talk:List of unions affiliated with the AFL-CIO

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MJL in topic Affiliated unions by membership

Web site linking

edit

Providing a link to every single union's Web site runs afoul of Wikipedia:External links in several ways. Under "Important points to remember," #2 says "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article." Under "Official links," "Minimize the number of links" concludes: "Wikipedia does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website. Wikipedia does not attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites. Complete directories lead to clutter and to placing undue emphasis on what the subject says." Additionally, it runs afoul of WP:LINKFARM and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. In other words, Wikipedia doesn't exist to be a way of finding AFL-CIO member union Web sites. Official sites exist to provide more information on the article. Linking to each union's site doesn't add information to the encyclopedia article discussing AFL-CIO membership criteria, or establish the number or names of member unions (one link to the AFl-CIO site does that). - Tim1965 (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, you appear to be correct. And since nearly every item on the list has an article, I can think of no argument for breaking the rule.RevelationDirect (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Affiliated unions by membership

edit

There definitely should be a table of the 56 affiliated unions by membership. Any objections to that? –MJLTalk 02:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply