Talk:List of volcanoes in Chile

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile High‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Total number of volcanoes in Chile

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This list shows only 141 volcanoes in Chile, while other references talk about more than 2900 of them (see http://www.emol.com/especiales/volcanes/index.htm). So who is right? 3000 volcanoes would meen one every 1500 meters of longitudinal territory (if uniformly distributed along Chile) which is scary... Sergio Mendoza

Reuters AlerNet mentions the following: "Chile's chain of about 2,000 volcanoes is the world's second-largest after Indonesia. Some 50 to 60 are on record as having erupted, and 500 are potentially active". Unfortunately the statement is unreferenced. Arjuno (talk 14:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Quizapu crater cerro azul.jpg Nominated for Deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:Quizapu crater cerro azul.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merge of lists

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I am going to merge the 5 lists of this article to a long sortable list. Then, the reader can order the list acc. to name, shape and elevation.

The 5. list is commented out and will be distributed to the right place.

The location north, south, pacific, etc would be made by the background color of the volcano record.

Later, the coordinates have to be transformed to only deg|min|sec or to only decimal figures to get an exact ordered list acc. to latitude.

This disposition allows a better control about the list: e.g.: now the Volcano "Negrillar" is twice in the list.

Some better idea?. --Best regards, KS (wat?) 14:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think the merger is a bad idea. A distinction into geographical groups like in List of volcanoes in Indonesia (not it is a featured list) is preferable in my opinion since it is mucho more reader friendly than "bulk data list". Dentren | ^Talk 18:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The geographical groups are given through the latitude. --92.227.160.157 (talk) 10:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup and return to pre-merge layout

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As of June 5 2015 this article is unreadable. It has very little prose and context and the selection of volcanoes is arbitrary. Further on the lists were merged without consensus (se older comments above). I will be finxing this page to the pre-unilateral-merged layout trying to not lose valuable information that was added after that.

Some changes to be intruduced (reverted back in some cases are):

Return to pre-merge layout that allows things to be more readable (see List of volcanoes in Indonesia for what a good list is).
Remove OVDAs surveillance column. Wikipedia is no substitute for ONEMIs and OVDAS webpage. OVDAS monitoring change too often to keep things updated. One single link to these institution at the bottom of the page should be enough. Focus should be on the volcanoes from a natural science and geographical point of view not on the activities of OVDAS on them.
Remove other names. Nearly all volcanoes in Chile have well established names. It is not reasonable to have column just for the the volcanoes that might have ambiguous names. Footnotes are an alternative in such cases.
Establish critera for volcanoes to be included. I propose:

Only active or dormant (Holocene), excluding extinct. There far to many extinct volcanoes and they are difficult to identify.
Only arc, back-arc or hotspot volcanoes. Volcanoes in mid-ocean ridges are far to many and unknown.
Exclude parasitic cones as these belong to larger volcanoes that are more well known.
Smaller eruptive centra should be treated in groups rather than as individual cones (if they occur in groups).

Dentren | ^Talk 15:02, 7 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of volcanoes in Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on List of volcanoes in Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic