Talk:Liv Boeree

Merger proposal

The two articles are basically the same. They contain a lot of the same text.

This one is better, though. It's more 'polished'. --The Machine (talk) 02:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Agree nothing to discuss really, the improper title version should had been page moved, but as it is I'm just going to put a CSDG6 tag on the dupe article.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡^Talk 03:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

"Coached by top pros"

Anyone who follows poker will know that Annie Duke and Dave Ulliot are certainly not "top pros" as stated in the article. Ulliot for example is most likely a losing player, as is Annie Duke having to make appearances on celebrity apprentice USA. The two would be considered "TV personalities" and certainly not top players. I would very much doubt either of them could beat 100NL online. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.28.0.218 (talk) 23:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

If it's a choice between your unsupported assertion that they are losers or the statistical evidence that Duke has earned $3.5m in live tournaments (2nd in the women's all-time money list) and Ulliott more than $5.5m, then don't be surprised if we don't give your opinion too much credence. Grubstreet (talk) 15:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually if you look at annie dukes tournament record overall (winnings-buyins) you will find she actually has a -30% ROI in $10k BI tournaments and I have not run the numbers for Ulliot but I can assume he is similar. So I would give my "opinion" credence over yours due to the fact I know a lot more than you about this and have actually done research rather than loaded up hendon mob or something and just pulled a figure from there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.201.128 (talk) 14:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Liv Boeree EPT.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Liv Boeree EPT.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://poker.ladbrokes.com/en/poker-events/elc

  Triggered by \bladbrokes\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liv Boeree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141028004225/http://www.poker.co.uk/boeree-gruissem-kurganov-team-up-for-charity/ to http://www.poker.co.uk/boeree-gruissem-kurganov-team-up-for-charity/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)