This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
Hi @Averylturner, to be honest, most editors don't think about the difference between the two all that hard, and many reviewers only use stub/start/C. As for things you can do to improve the article, two stand out: first, you should get a cover image, or just wait for one (though I've written on books, I've never done this myself, since there are friendly gnomes who patrol articles looking for images to add, and they've always beaten me to it); second, you should move most of what exists in the lead of the article to the body of it, then rewrite the lead so that it summarizes the body. See WP:LEAD for the guidelines on this part.
After that, you can probably skip from C-class right to WP:GA, if you're inclined to put it up for review. This can take a while, but there will be a backlog drive in January, and this article is short, so I think it's pretty likely it will be picked up for review during the drive. -- asilvering (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
