Talk:London Underground strikes
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Picture
editIt would be helpful to have a picture, either of the disruption caused or the picket of workers on strike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Absolutelypuremilk (talk • contribs) 20:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Untitled 2016 comment
editThis is a very misleading article - totally out of date, missing the 2015 main strike for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.41.117 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Missing London Tube Strike 2015
editThere are missing tube strikes for this discussion. There are likely more, but off the top of my head the 2015 strike is not listed. SmashnGrab (talk) 23:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The article London Underground strikes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Out of date and misleading article, unlikely to be resolvable as clearly no interest by editors
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andymmutalk 13:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Andymmu I have now formally proposed it - it's very outdated, and anything useful could be merged into the main articles. Turini2 (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- @GB fan Ah, thanks - no one made a comment against it here, so - I'll go down the AFD route Turini2 (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Still very poor article, why hasn't it been deleted yet? Ianmurray5 (talk) 11:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- @GB fan Ah, thanks - no one made a comment against it here, so - I'll go down the AFD route Turini2 (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Very strange article
editTalks of strikes as being this constant, "intermittent" issue, but the dates in the table at the bottom seem to cluster around two specific time frames. 2A02:A210:20BA:D500:0:0:0:100B (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)