Talk:London congestion charge

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 82.69.109.214 in topic Operations and Technology
Former featured articleLondon congestion charge is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 5, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
March 31, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
June 7, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 28, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 22, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
January 12, 2013Featured article reviewDemoted
April 1, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 17, 2008, February 17, 2009, February 17, 2010, and February 17, 2013.
Current status: Former featured article

Splitting off ULEZ into a new article

edit

The ULEZ section is fairly big, and there is more content which could go in there - I think it's more than big enough to justify its own article, especially considering it also has a section in London low emission zone. Thoughts? Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 08:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

2002-2018 update: speeds have gone down, delays have gone up

edit

Figures for 2002-2008:

Figures for 2008-2018:

The Wikipedia article cuts off at 2012 and misinforms the reader "this trend towards slower traffic movement has ceased and traffic speeds have remained more stable". This is not the case. Speeds are going down year-over-year and delays are going up. Except for 2003-2006 and 2012, congestion has gone up year-over-year since the introduction of the congestion charge. The article should reflect this. ForgotMyAccountName (talk) 18:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Operations and Technology

edit

This currently says "Since 2009, IBM has been responsible for the day-to-day operation of the charging system". In fact, Capita regained the contract in 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.109.214 (talk) 09:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply