Talk:Lothoo Nitharwal

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Sitush in topic NPOV

NPOV

edit

It's kinda hard to see this as NPOV when it contains phrases like "He was a socialistic radical thinker and pioneer social reformer at a time when one could not even think of freedom" and "Lothoo broke the main gate by hitting it with his head." I'm removing the most questionable bits. --Nucleusboy 01:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

According to the article:

He got into an argument with Kunwar, and "without showing any anger" (I wonder who was watching) murdered him. People paid him protection money. He looted towns. He robbed a rich caravan of the Seths, who had been his allies.

If this is what his supporters say, then let the POV stand. Maproom (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have stubbed the article, to which LRBurdak was a major contributor. That person was known for copyright violations on a massive scale and for using unreliable, pov-y sources. In this instance, the sole source appeared to be a self-published hagiography by Ranwa, the tone was all wrong and it was factually dubious even in the most basic things, eg: claiming that Nitharwal fought against the British Raj when in fact the British Raj did not even exist until after the 1857 rebellion.
Unfortunately, I am struggling to find any alternate sources and that raises the issue of whether or not the guy is actually notable. - Sitush (talk) 15:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Lothoo Nitharwal.JPG Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Lothoo Nitharwal.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 21 November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply