Talk:Love Wrecked

GA observation

I'm not reviewing the article, but you are going to want to format all the citations using the Template:Cite web before it has a chance of passing. Nikki311 02:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I am reviewing this article and unfortunately, I am failing it. Good job on writing a decent article on a TV/straight-to-DVD movie that is stable and factually accurate, but imporvements are required for a promotion in quality.

• The references need to list authors when possible.
• I removed the taglines per Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines#Tagline.
• The plot section reads like a back cover or product description on a company website; I have suspicions that it was even copied from another website (excuse me if they copied it from here).
• The budget and "the film was shortened as Randal Kleiser wanted to target the film toward more family audiences than teenager audiences" need citations.
• The reception section is only four sentences long. There are at least four more reviews over at Rotten Tomatoes. Say why critics did not like this movie, instead of just saying that they did not like it.

The following are not necessary for GA:

• It would be nice to have short desciptions for all characters.
• The production section is very short, although I am unsure if you will be able to find any more information on this film.
• A free picture of Amanda Bynes would be nice.
• Mentioning who director Randal Kleiser and producer Lance Bass are would be interesting.

I apologize that no one reviewed this sooner. Thanks, –thedemonhog talk • edits 18:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I uploaded a screenshot of the movie to the article. i hope it's okay. Veeboy (talk) 05:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Love Wrecked or Lovewrecked?

It would be nice if we could agree on a consistent spelling to be used throughout the article – at the time of writing there are 4 mentions of Love Wrecked in the article, versus 18 of Lovewrecked. Can anyone rule definitively on this? -- Picapica (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Love Wrecked. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080506203426/http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/070EFAC33653B361802572C6003EC97D?OpenDocument to http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/070EFAC33653B361802572C6003EC97D?OpenDocument
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507011133/http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Lovewrecked to http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Lovewrecked

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 7 January 2018 (UTC)