Talk:Lucy Ellmann

Latest comment: 6 years ago by CWH in topic Contested deletion
edit

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/05/17/1052885444952.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... there is a impressive list of fellowships, prizes, and residences.-ch (talk) 05:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply