| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Luigi Calabresi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Objectivity
editThis page is totally unacceptable by any standard except as hagiography.
Accusations of his involvement in, and the specifics of his legal exoneration of said involvement in Pinelli's death must be included. For example, he was the man investigating Pinelli and was in charge of his interrogation, not merely someone who worked at the cuestura. Sofri's conviction is highly suspect - it is downright dishonest to refer to him as responsible when there is a book, available in English, detailing the factual inconsistencies in his trial. At the very least, this critique must be mentioned. There is a history of attacks agains Calabresi by the left that should be referred to. In fact, his death and the major parts of his life that have historical interest are related to the Anni di Piombo in Italy and without this background, and attendant links (for example to the Piazza Fontana bombing), this article amounts to disinformation. It's highly doubtful that these issues will be resolved, however. The involvement of the secret services and right-wing masonic lodges, while documented, is going to appear a bit "out there" to any Americans or Brits or Australians.
Also the massive comma splice is bad English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.27.107.44 (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- The addition of reliable sources and the expansion of text, as well as a somber and better use of language, should suffice. -The Gnome (talk) 14:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)