Talk:M. G. S. Narayanan

Untitled

The author's notability can be verified from a search in google books. He's a very well known historian. The first draft was heavily from the Calicut University profile. That source doesn't mention any copyright.Anyway I've subsequently added other info to it. NMKuttiady (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

This is a major rewrite of the article Talk:M.G.S._Narayanan/Temp. If it's fine, pls move it to the main page. The man has nothing to do with me. I just added a page on him because he is a very relevant personality in my favorite subject - History. Hope this if fine.NMKuttiady (talk) 16:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M. G. S. Narayanan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3077
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3087
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3095
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3104
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3116
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3135
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417054433/http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3157 to http://www.madhyamam.com/weekly/3157

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

WP:Undue, WP:Peacock, and other issues

I have removed much from this article. The edit history suggests a spate of additions and bulking by mostly WP:SPA (e.g. User:Hareeshh). They may not be aware of our BLP, notability and other content guidelines. To repeatedly say, "[...] is among the few southern Indian historians known nationally and internationally" and "also a specialist in ancient Indian history" etc, then cite a newspaper or particularly the university website where he worked, is not okay. A "historian known nationally and internationally" would have such statements in scholarly papers, reviews and international festschrift. All claims to discovering inscriptions, scholarly fame and scholarly notability should be supported by scholarly citations, not the website of a school where the person worked per SPS and COI. There is still more trimming we can do to this article. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 02:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

I have once again remove WP:SOAP and WP:Coatracking from this article. This is a BLP article, and the content should really be carefully summarized from peer reviewed scholarly sources and such, if it is notable. Please discuss if you want major reverts, and do ping WBG and me. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 04:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)