Talk:M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage
Latest comment: 2 months ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
 | M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 16, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 01:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- No issues with the image.
- External links good; the DAB links tool isn't working.
- The M19 MGMC had specifications to the M24 Chaffee. - Do you mean similar specifications?
Done - The M19 was developed from the T65 which was based on the M5 light tank chassis; initially as the T65E1 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage. - This confused me, do you mean that the original name for the M19 was the T65E1? Consider rephrasing. Done
- a production of 1,000 had been requested - 1,000 of what? The T65? Done
- I'd like to see more information on the Korean War service history. Here is a source mentioning use in the Pusan Perimeter.
- Are you sure that source is 100% reliable?--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Cerebellum: Found another source and took care of it.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Are you sure that source is 100% reliable?--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- The bibliography says the Gander book was published in 2013, but you reference Gander 2010. Is this the same book? Same story with Green 2000/2014, and I don't know what Chamberlain & Ellis is. Done
Looks pretty good, I'll just put this on hold until we fix the above issues! --Cerebellum (talk) 00:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for making those correction so quickly! Pass. (Just so you know, though, I won't be able to finish the M21 Mortar Motor Carriage review until next weekend, sorry about that.) --Cerebellum (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 | On 27 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to M19 multiple gun motor carriage. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Copperhead
edit- Just came across some brit 1945 paper work naming this the Copperhead, new one on me.
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:M40 Gun Motor Carriage which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)