Talk:Malajoe Batawi

A fact from Malajoe Batawi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Lie Kim Hok's Malajoe Batawi was the first grammar of Batavian Malay?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Malajoe Batawi.

Wikipedia

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Publishing year

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

So, was it published in 1883 or 1884? sentausa (talk) 14:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

1884. 1883 was a typo. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic