Talk:Mama (2013 film)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Mama (2012 film) → Mama (2013 film) – The film was originally announced as a 2012 release, but recent reports indicate that the date has been pushed back to 2013. —Flax5 14:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comments Which recent reports? Should not moved until release date is fixed. Or we may need to move again to 2014.. --Tito Dutta ✉ 05:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Collider, IndieWire, ComingSoon, Bloody Disgusting and Shock Till You Drop all agree that the film will be released on January 18, 2013. I've seen nothing to suggest it will be delayed until 2014 – that seems quite unlikely, considering that post-production is already complete. —Flax5 12:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for giving these references! --Tito Dutta ✉ 12:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Daniel Kash name misspelled in listing of cast
editDaniel Kash's name is misspelled in listing of cast as Daniel but.Kash. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.228.228.49 (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Mama production country
editI know that screen daily has listed this as a US-Spanish-Canadian co-production, but I believe it's only a Spanish Canadian one. Variety describes it as a "De Milo/Toma 78" production (A Universal (in U.S.) release presented with Guillermo del Toro of a De Milo/Toma 78 production.) source. Screen Daily also only states the "De Milo/Toma 78" production. (source). Hollywood Reporter also only lists it as a Spanish-Canadian production source, as does Deadline (source). I'm going to change it to just Spanish-Canadian. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, WP:FILMLEAD now says, "If the film's nationality is singularly defined by reliable sources (e.g., being called an American film), it should be identified in the opening sentence. If the nationality is not singular, cover the different national interests later in the lead section." (It is a way to simplify the matter so we do not have to deal with a string of nationalities.) It does not seem like this film has a singular nationality. I would just state "English-language" in the lead sentence and then mention the specific national backgrounds in the lead section. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- The film identifies itself as a Canadian-Spanish co-production in its end credits. - Gothicfilm (talk) 22:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mama (2013 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150720070434/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms35.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms35.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Mama In IT (2017)
editIs there any official confirmation that the woman from the painting in IT is Mama? whatculture.com doesn't exactly strike me as a reliable source, and even that doesn't say that it's Mama. 24.71.180.185 (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mama (2013 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607031953/http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/mama-2013-0 to http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/mama-2013-0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)