Talk:Marietje Schaake
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marietje Schaake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Original research
editMany thanks for the feedback and improvement. What can we do about 'original research' and to which part does it refer to exactly? Stefanbrussel (talk) 14:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- "Original research" may be all those parts that are not supported by reliable sources. What we can do about them, for instance, is to remove them. Sander1453 (talk) 17:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Only one paragraph uses references, the rest of the article has no source references whatsoever, hence "This article needs additional citations for verification." And because two of the article's contributors have declared a professional connection with the article's subject, I have also marked the article for possible original research. The best way to resolve both issues is to provide additional references to published sources, ideally for all facts in the article. – Editør (talk) 20:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marietje Schaake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141228172919/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96945/MARIETJE_SCHAAKE_home.html to http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96945/MARIETJE_SCHAAKE_home.html/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)