Talk:Mary Scudamore

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Re: possible deletion

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

She does have an ODNB article, Simon Adams, ‘Scudamore , Mary, Lady Scudamore (c.1550–1603)’, unfortunately I can't access it. However, I think if she's notable enough for them, she's notable enough for WP. Boleyn (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Have now added some info from ODNB. Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The ODNB citation and the privy chamber status mentioned seem sufficient to me to decline the speedy deletion tag, which I should add seems to me to have been placed in good faith; this is a judgment call on my part. If someone feels strongly about this entry's possible non-notability, I suggest an articles for deletion process. If you have questions or problems, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

OK, on further examination she does just about pass notability. PatGallacher (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic