The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DrStrauss (talk · contribs) 18:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
On hold, see 2. b.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): 
c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Placing on hold due to sub-criterion b. The last paragraph of "Civil War and widowhood" could be made clearer or better in terms of inline citations.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- No issues.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No issues.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No issues.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Excellent use of images, extensive but not excessive.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold, see 2. b.
- Pass/Fail:
- @DrStrauss: Let me know if the change I made is acceptable to you. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.