Talk:Maryland Route 150

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Fredddie in topic GA Review
Good articleMaryland Route 150 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 3, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 150/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 00:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Try mixing in a few more names for MD 150. The subject of every sentence in the lead is invariably "MD 150" or "the state highway". The other sections are not as bad, but more names will not hurt. "Reaches its eastern terminus" is a bit wordy when "ends" accomplishes the same thing.
    I diversified the references to the state highway in the Lead and Route description and simplified the terminus.  V 01:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you. –Fredddie 01:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The line about the highway being made of oyster shells should be referenced. I actually wanted to read more about that.
    Both the first and second sentences are referenced to Ref 5.  V 03:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
    There it is, thanks. –Fredddie 04:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    More pictures can't hurt
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I'm placing this on hold to allow for a couple fixes. –Fredddie 01:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you for your review, Fredddie.  V 03:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Passing the article now. –Fredddie 01:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply