Talk:Maryland Route 150/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 00:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Try mixing in a few more names for MD 150. The subject of every sentence in the lead is invariably "MD 150" or "the state highway". The other sections are not as bad, but more names will not hurt. "Reaches its eastern terminus" is a bit wordy when "ends" accomplishes the same thing.

   I diversified the references to the state highway in the Lead and Route description and simplified the terminus.  VC  01:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

   Thank you. –Fredddie™ 01:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The line about the highway being made of oyster shells should be referenced. I actually wanted to read more about that.

   Both the first and second sentences are referenced to Ref 5.  VC  03:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

   There it is, thanks. –Fredddie™ 04:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   More pictures can't hurt

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'm placing this on hold to allow for a couple fixes. –Fredddie™ 01:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

   Thank you for your review, Fredddie.  VC  03:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

   Passing the article now. –Fredddie™ 01:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)