Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Stormyruiz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

I came across Astrology and health on new page patrol today, and it seems to fit best within the framework of this page. I know nothing about the subject; hope someone familiar with it would undertake a merge. Thanks. Maralia (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

not so Moon, but Neptune's

edit

i'd edit this myself.. but you know..i dont/didnt wanna make things 'visibly' worst, however....

listing the lymphatic system w/ the Moon is highly incorrect.. note that it 'LS' is associated w/ the sign of Pisces.. it's well known Neptune is associated w/ Pisces, we in the med-astro field, associate the lymphatic system w/ Neptune, NOT the Moon... plz correct. oh and Pluto – elimination, is then associated w/ the large intestines. plz add same. thanx! 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:500B:2775:7B2A:33F (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Pseudoscience?

edit

Methinks it's a pseudoreligion!

I'd be careful, if I were you, about excessively swinging the pseudoscience hatched because it might wear out. 67.206.183.155 (talk) 08:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical astrology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical astrology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Melothesia separate article

edit

Right now there is a redirection of "melothesia" to this article, but melothesia quite exceeds the boundaries of medical astrology. It is a name for the macrocosm—microcosm correspondence, right? As such it is rather cosmological and it has remarkable parallelisms in Indian, Chinese and other traditional cosmologies. Can you think of objections to starting a separate article? Cheers, Desde la Torre (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead, write the article. It's still a pseudoscience and any new article should make that perfectly clear. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply