Talk:Mega Shark Versus Giant Octopus

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

USS Missouri

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've twice now cut references in the plot summary about the naval destroyer being "portrayed by" the USS Missouri, but since they've been reverted both times, I wanted to discuss it here and allow the chance for some discussion before I cut it again. I don't have a copy of the DVD at hand, so you might be around about the 63 thing, but I'm still unsure about this addition to the article. First of all, the prose currently reads in the plot summary "...a U.S. "naval destroyer" (portrayed by the Iowa class battleship USS Missouri)...". It's not really accurate to say it's "portrayed by" the USS Missouri, is it? I mean, it's not as if the real-life USS Missouri itself was used in the film. It seems that it would be more accurate to say "based on the USS Missouri", but I would think that should be included in "Production", (something like: "The destroyer featured in the film was based on the real-life USS Missouri...) not in "Plot Summary". Further, the film doesn't refer to the ship as the USS Missouri in the movie itself, does it? If not, it would be WP:OR to say that the destroyer is based on the USS Missouri, and we'd need a source before we could include it here... — Hunter Kahn _(c) 23:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I watched the film a couple of days ago. In the film the ship is not named apart from the label "US Naval Destroyer", but it's clearly an Iowa class battleship - e.g. it has two three-gun turrets forward and one aft. The pennant number 63 is clearly shown during one panning shot - it's almost from the same angle as this shot:

It looks like stock footage of the Missouri was used (unless it was CGI it would have to have been, the real ship has been a museum in Pearl Harbor since 1999).

The wording could be better, something like "The destroyer featured in the film was stock footage of the USS Missouri..." or something similar. It probably doesn't need to be in the actual plot summary either, but I'm not sure where else to put it. Trivia sections are bad.

Finally, the ship was definitely shooting its main guns at the megalodon, rather than firing missiles. Special effects of discharges from the forward guns were added. A shame that the film-makers didn't have access to some footage of an Iowa-class firing a full broadside: Deadlock (talk) 23:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mega Shark Versus Giant Octopus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic