Talk:Mehandipur Balaji Temple

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Mathsci in topic PROD

Untitled

edit

This article lacks good grammar and is too prone to vandalist attacks... the mythological aspects mentioned lacks proper references...

FAMustafa 19:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20110725035609/http://balajimehandipur.org/legend.html and http://www.rambhakt.in/mehandipur-balaji. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

PROD

edit

This article was proposed for speedy deletion without any check for notability. It is a notable shrine for healing in India and I have added three references. The second, published by University of Chicago Press, contains an entire chapter on the shrine and how it functions. The article can evidently be improved and there is no case at all for deletion. Mathsci (talk) 06:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply