Talk:Mero Mound Group (Diamond Bluff Site)

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinate error

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

These coordinates map to the middle of a channel of the Mississippi River. This is close to the correct coordinates (I do not know them), but the Mero Mound Group is on land, not in the middle of the Mississippi.

—24.131.182.30 (talk) 17:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done. I was originally leery of having any coordinates at all for an NHRP property with a restricted address, but I see that the site covers an area of about a square mile and that its location is readily found online; so I used the coordinates from this paper, which are precise only as to degrees and minutes. Thanks for pointing out that the coordinates previously in the article were impossible. Deor (talk) 23:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic