Talk:Metropolitan Tower (Manhattan)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 04:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

This looks like another excellent article on the architecture of New York by Epicgenius and is therefore likely to be close to Good Article status already. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

This is a stable and well-written article. 74.7% of authorship is by Epicgenius and 22.6% by Abductive. It is currently ranked C class.

• The article is of appropriate length, with 3,290 words of readable prose.
• There are no obvious spelling or grammar errors.
• It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant Manuals of Style.
• Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 19.4% chance of copyright violation with a 1990 article by Goldberger cited in the article. The item is directly quoted and appropriately referenced.
• All images have appropriate licensing and either CC or public domain tags.
• References appear to be from reputable sources.

I will now complete the review. simongraham (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Assessment

The six good article criteria:

1. It is reasonable well written

   the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

   it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable

   it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

   all inline citations are from reliable sources;

   it contains no original research;

   it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

   it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

3. It is broad in its coverage

   it addresses the main aspects of the topic.

   it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. It has a neutral point of view

   it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.

5. It is stable

   it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

   images are (relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Congratulations, Epicgenius. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass simongraham (talk) 05:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)