 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editThere's a clear contradiction here. It claims that a "metteur en scene" is a director which asserts a distinctive style, then goes on to claim that "metteur en scene" and "auteur" are opposites, and that "auteur" refers to a director with a distinctive style and that "metteur en scene" refers simply to a director (who doesn't assert anything). Then it does the opposite AGAIN in the last line. -- Also not signed in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.161.99 (talk) 05:56, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
This page needs to be formatted properly, it doesn't explain the phrase at all, and merely provides a background for it. --not signed in
Also needs to cite sources. I recommended it to link to Auteur theory, as metteur en scene is a term often studied with auteurism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.226.18 (talk) 00:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Metteur en scène is often described as being separate from an auteur. There are few writers on auteur theory that can agree on most things. Just a suggestion for other definitions. Maybe this should be joined with the auteur page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.128.172 (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)