| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Discuss links here
editEditors regularly clean out undiscussed links from this article. Please discuss here if you want a link not to be cleaned out regularly. (You can help!)--VS talk 04:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
VS talk has removed an external link to a website which I published. I believe the link is a relevant citation to this article. If I had inserted the link in the article, I would acknowledge a potential conflict of interest. However I did not add the external link to my website for this article. The link was inserted in the first version by User:Golden_Wattle.
The link:
is still an original source reference for this article. I believe this link is highly relevant to the article. Under Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline I should not add external links to articles I have published (even though they may be authoritative texts) except after raising them for discussion on the talk page. Please discuss and decide on the relevancy of the link.
Yeah I think the link is relevant to the article. Its also relevant to the "Anarchy in Australia" stub I am slowly grooming towards respectability.....I will add it to the External links of that article. Last I heard Michale Matteson was still an active Australian Anarchist and while nothing he has done since the "good old days" of Vietnam may have been so flashy it hasn't been without importance. Jeremytrewindixon 05:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- There seems to be no discussion forthcoming on this matter, but as an outsider, I agree that this is a relevant link and will add it. --Cast (talk) 04:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)