Talk:Michael Walker, Baron Walker of Aldringham
 | Michael Walker, Baron Walker of Aldringham has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 20, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that General Lord Walker was the first commander of the ground component of NATO's Implementation Force in 1995? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editWe should mention that he was the Land Component Commander during the NATO IFOR operation - as COMARRC.
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Michael Walker, Baron Walker of Aldringham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is a very interesting article, about a man with a long and distinguished career. It's in very good shape, and I have reviewed it below according to the criteria for Good Articles.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- The article is well referenced. I've changed the link to the list of witnesses to the Iraq Enquiry to 1 February as it was linking to 11 January.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- There are plenty of appropriately placed citations. However, could you find a reference for Baron Walker's place of birth and education?
- It is referenced. It's the very first reference (the BBC article "A Lifetime of Service"). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- I've copied that reference to the line. Harrison49 (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is referenced. It's the very first reference (the BBC article "A Lifetime of Service"). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- There are plenty of appropriately placed citations. However, could you find a reference for Baron Walker's place of birth and education?
- C. No original research:
- There does not appear to be any original research.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- The content covers the subject well and is well-focused.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is written from a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- The article does not appear to change detrimentally day by day.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- The sole image is freely licensed and uses an appropriate caption.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratulations, this is a Good Article. Harrison49 (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Walker, Baron Walker of Aldringham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027173712/http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page10480.asp to http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page10480.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Blazon
editI have just checked Debrett's Peerage 2019 and found that he blazon for Walker's shield of arms specifies three acorns Or, not four as had been written here originally. I have corrected both the text and my illustration. I notice that the text which was here before had no source listed. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)