Why did you replace my text with plentiful sources, with your own.?!

edit

@Griboski, Why did you replace my text with plentiful sources, with your own,

My text is all correct, true, sourceful and referenced:

It has been confirmed by the security institutions in Kosovo that he led the Banjska attack. The announcement by the Kosovo government of the two groups that carried out the attack as 'terrorist organizations' also incriminates the leader of the attack, Milan Radoicic, who is already wanted by the Kosovar authorities, in terrorism.

Why would you delete it, arent you neutral on this topic?! Is this some kind of slavic nationalism or what?! Leutrim.P (talk) 06:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making accusations. You added about 8 citations that all essentially say the same thing, so there's no need to have so many per WP:OVERCITE. I changed your text because it wasn't quite accurately reflecting the sources and it needed some grammatical adjustments. It is obvious he was involved in the attack if he was charged; "confirmed" that he led the attack seems more apt if he was convicted, so this is more about semantics. It is redundant to state that he led the attack and the in the next sentence, again, state that he was incriminated as the leader of the attack.
You wrote "the two groups that carried out the attack" but the the references don't state this or what groups it's referring to. This reference you added says that he was specifically charged with several criminal offenses related to the illegal purchase of weapons and "causing general danger". Per this I see it also says that 45 people were all charged with "violation of the constitutional and legal order, terror activities, funding terrorism and money laundering."
If I missed something, I'd be glad for us to add it to the article. Thanks. --Griboski (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply