This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Millennium Force article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Millennium Force is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 13, 2014. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
DYK nomination
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Millennium Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121130062314/http://www.chauvetlighting.com/colorful-rides-at-cedar-point-by-chauvet.html to http://www.chauvetlighting.com/colorful-rides-at-cedar-point-by-chauvet.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Millennium Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131225071433/http://archive.wkyc.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=243224 to http://archive.wkyc.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=243224
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120516235855/http://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/ride/statistics.cfm to https://leviathan.canadaswonderland.com/public/ride/statistics.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Why is this ride's height 310'?
editIf this ride's height was measured at 310' 11", then why did it say that its height is 310'? 208.59.132.152 (talk) 01:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Giga definition
editWhen Millennium Force opened in 2000, it was the first and only giga coaster, a term coined by Intamin for a coaster that exceeded 300 feet. The definition has been changed by enthusiasts to apply to a coaster from any manufacturer that exceeds 300 feet. Then with the construction of Orion, Cedar Fair (along with the KI fanboys) stretched it to include a coaster with a "drop" that exceeds 300 feet. Such information does not belong in this article, particularly when the opening paragraph discusses the origin of the term. Originally it was 300 feet in height, and that was it. —JlACEer (talk) 04:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- I feel like there should at least be a note or parenthesis stating that the definition was changed in 2019. If it just remains as flat only 300+ft, then it wouldn't correlate with not only the current definition, but also the definition as listed on the article for "roller coaster."
- Maybe something like this:
- "Millennium Force broke five world records and was the world's first giga coaster, a term coined by Intamin and Cedar Point to represent roller coasters that exceed 300 feet (91 m) in height (later changed in 2019 to include both heights and/or drops between 300-399 feet)." AtomiicCoasters (talk) 23:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- That much detail is not necessary in this article. Giga coaster is already linked and if people need more information they can click on it. When the term was originally defined it was a coaster over 300 feet and that's all that needs to be said in the opening paragraph. This is exactly how the Magnum XL-200 wiki article is also written. The definition for a hypercoaster at the time of Magnum's opening was any coaster 200 feet. The fact that it has been narrowed (by some) to 200 to 299.99 feet is not relevant to that article, and the fact that giga coaster has been redefined (by some) to 300 to 300.99 feet is also not relevant to this article.—JlACEer (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)