Talk:Miloš Trifunović (politician)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Akrasia25 (talk · contribs) 19:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I will pick this article up. I know something about Yugoslavia--Akrasia25 (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I just want you to know that I will be on a vacation until 1 August so I will not be able to address any of the concerns raised until then. OakMapping (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for letting us know and have a great vacation. It's an important article and I would like to continue to help. I don't think that this is at a GA level right now. Another editor has asked for clarifications. I would like to suggest that we fail this for now but only for the timing to not just keep this on hold. Fix the clarifications and I will be all over this. Best. --Akrasia25 (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Review in progress

The article is clearly written and covers an interesting topic. This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality assessment scale for one project but not rated in the other projects.

The six good article criteria:

1. It is reasonable well written the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

It complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable It contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

All inline citations are from reliable sources Four references are in English. I have to check the books out.

It contained no original research;

I found the English books listed in the references and to see if they matched and are solid RS.

1. I checked ref of Nationalism and Yugoslavia: education, Yugoslavism and the Balkans Before World War 2. on page 46. I have the book, no plagiarism and I cleared up the lack of clarification. ref matches.

2. I checked War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945: The Chetniks- good

3. and I checked War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941–1945: Occupation and Collaboration and these references and page numbering are very good.

I commend the authors for the page number of the references which made my work easy.

It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

3. It is broad in its coverage

It addresses the main aspects of the topic;

It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

4. It has a neutral point of view

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.

5. It is stable

It does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. The recommendation is that more pictures could be found maybe?

Images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

After checking three of the four English references I want to make this article a GA. Well done. --Akrasia25 (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)--Akrasia25 (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)