Talk:Miloš Trifunović (politician)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a Yugoslav politician, Miloš Trifunović, was a professor of zoology and botany before pursuing a career in politics? Source: Ministarstvo prosvete i ministri Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije: 1918-1941 p. 122
  • ALT1:... that a Yugoslav politician, Miloš Trifunović, was for a brief time professor of zoology and botany despite finishing Faculty of Philosphy of the Belgrade Higher School? Source: Ministarstvo prosvete i ministri Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije: 1918-1941 p. 122

Moved to mainspace by OakMapping (talk). Self-nominated at 08:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC).

The article is certainly long enough. The copyright detector says a violation is unlikely. The hooks are interesting and cited inline. This would appear to be your first DYK, so there is no need for a QPQ. Although I can't access the source cited for the hook, I will AGF.

However, the article wasn't created within 7 days of its DYK nomination, it wasn't expanded five-fold within 7 days of its nomination and it hasn't been promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of its nomination. For more information, see WP:DYKRULES. Regretfully, I'm going to have to fail this. @OakMapping: I would recommend you wait for the article to be passed as a GA and then renominate it for DYK within 7 days. I don't see any reason for it not to be approved then. Good luck! Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

@Amanuensis Balkanicus: Eligibility criteria 1c states: "Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace.". I have created this article on 20 March 2021 as a userspace draft, but I moved it to mainspace only a day before I nominated it for DYK. So, shouldn't this be eglible, I am sorry if I misinterpreted something. Thanks for picking this up regardless, OakMapping (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

@OakMapping: If the article reached the mainspace on 6 April, then yes, it would eligible. That would certainly change the verdict I gave above. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Given that the article reached the mainspace on 6 April, I am approving this. ALT1 seems more interesting than ALT0, IMHO. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Miloš Trifunović (politician)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Akrasia25 (talk · contribs) 19:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I will pick this article up. I know something about Yugoslavia--Akrasia25 (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I just want you to know that I will be on a vacation until 1 August so I will not be able to address any of the concerns raised until then. OakMapping (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for letting us know and have a great vacation. It's an important article and I would like to continue to help. I don't think that this is at a GA level right now. Another editor has asked for clarifications. I would like to suggest that we fail this for now but only for the timing to not just keep this on hold. Fix the clarifications and I will be all over this. Best. --Akrasia25 (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Review in progress

The article is clearly written and covers an interesting topic. This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality assessment scale for one project but not rated in the other projects.

The six good article criteria:

1. It is reasonable well written the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

It complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable It contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

All inline citations are from reliable sources Four references are in English. I have to check the books out.

It contained no original research;

I found the English books listed in the references and to see if they matched and are solid RS.

1. I checked ref of Nationalism and Yugoslavia: education, Yugoslavism and the Balkans Before World War 2. on page 46. I have the book, no plagiarism and I cleared up the lack of clarification. ref matches.

2. I checked War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945: The Chetniks- good

3. and I checked War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941–1945: Occupation and Collaboration and these references and page numbering are very good.

I commend the authors for the page number of the references which made my work easy.

It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

3. It is broad in its coverage

It addresses the main aspects of the topic;

It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

4. It has a neutral point of view

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.

5. It is stable

It does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. The recommendation is that more pictures could be found maybe?

Images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

After checking three of the four English references I want to make this article a GA. Well done. --Akrasia25 (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)--Akrasia25 (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Infobox order

I am pretty sure the offices he held are supposed to be in reverse chronological order, see Samuel Adams which is an FA. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

This still needs to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Not sure how to do that. SA has order number and this article has office number.--Akrasia25 (talk) 16:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Tags

There are a couple of outstanding tags on this article where clarification is needed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done I added dates he was a minister and removed a comment on a policy that might have only been in place for 2 years and the references I have do not support that statement in anyway.--Akrasia25 (talk) 13:43, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)