Talk:Milwaukee Avenue Historic District
Milwaukee Avenue Historic District has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 8, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that residents of 22½ St. in Minneapolis petitioned the City Council and changed the street's name to Milwaukee Avenue because the '½' made them feel as if they lived in an alley? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editThis review is transcluded from Talk:Milwaukee Avenue Historic District/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Preliminary review
editLooks great. Nice pictures, good history. The only thing that needs to be checked are the few {{fact}} tags that I put in that didn't appear to have citations. Once those are completed, I think this will be ready for move to GA. Best, Epicadam (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Post-preliminary review
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Neat, simple, good work. GA status indeed. Best, Epicadam (talk) 02:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Milwaukee Avenue Historic District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723211757/http://milwaukeeavenue.net/files/MilwaukeeAve_Restoration.pdf to http://milwaukeeavenue.net/files/MilwaukeeAve_Restoration.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723211757/http://milwaukeeavenue.net/files/MilwaukeeAve_Restoration.pdf to http://milwaukeeavenue.net/files/MilwaukeeAve_Restoration.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)