Talk:Milwaukee Avenue Historic District/GA1

GA Review

Preliminary review

Looks great. Nice pictures, good history. The only thing that needs to be checked are the few {{fact}} tags that I put in that didn't appear to have citations. Once those are completed, I think this will be ready for move to GA. Best, Epicadam (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Post-preliminary review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Neat, simple, good work. GA status indeed. Best, Epicadam (talk) 02:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)