Talk:Minnesota State Highway 135
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minnesota State Highway 135. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204174552/http://www.dot.state.mn.us/roadway/data/reports/logpoint/d1.pdf to http://www.dot.state.mn.us/roadway/data/reports/logpoint/d1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Route into McKinley after bypass?
editFrom 1975 until the late 1980s, there's a little piece of highway marked on the state map running from Gilbert to McKinley. It appears at first glance to be an extension of Highway 37 but there's no direct indication of what highway it is. Given the evidence available I'd suspect that it was one of those unmarked 8xx/9xx highways to maintain a highway into McKinley as required by the definition of the route, but I have no way of confirming that. (I'd surmise that it was removed once McKinley's city limits expanded to include the current alignment of 135.) --Sable232 (talk) 01:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)