Talk:Mirage Men

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 23 October 2013 by reviewer Anne Delong (talk · contribs).

Film: British / Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

WP:NPOV severe violation(s)?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ok. To start, IMDb has a collective rating of 6.3 out of 10 with 645 ratings. That's pretty negative. It's also biased towards the film itself, only including positive reviews. It also states the following as a fact (which I am fairly certain WP's position on the stuff is it's not true):

"Mirage Men is about how the US government used mythology to cover up their advanced technology." Perhaps something along the lines of, "Mirage Men is a documentary covering various conspiracy theories involving the United States Government to use mythology in order to supposedly cover up advanced technology." It's a bit of a run-on sentence, however, I think it's a start and at least relatively unbiased. I hope this gets cleaned up. Thanks! KinneticSlammer (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Richard Doty - individual page?

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

before I just go off Willy nilly and create one I've been wondering if there's been any discussion here about why Richard Doty doesn't have a page establishing his rich and textured history in the UFO community of basically being a disinformation agent and sometimes selling the truth and fairly and balancedly somehow attempting to present that? Knoxster1969 (talk) 13:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic