New statements and sources added

edit

There was some highly controversial material just added, and while it's sourced to a reliable source, the source is behind a paywall which I cannot access. Can anyone please verify that the statements are supported by the sources? —Ynhockey (Talk) 00:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Apparently Haaretz very recently implemented a payable archive. When I was checking the sources they were still freely available. I do confirm the content of the sources. I do understand your reservations to unqualified en.WP users (good to see someone is checking contents here), but I am a well established editor in de.WP with several thousand edits, including article concerning the Middle East and Israel, if that's enough credit for you. Unfortunately I don't have any available contents of the Haaretz articles though. Regards, --Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC) PS: The links are now freely avaiable again, very odd, looks like Haaretz is experimenting with the archives? I made screnshots of the artcles and can provide them, if required.Reply
I've re-added the claim whose source is now freely available and which I can therefore confirm. (According to WP:PAYWALL, paywall articles should not be automatically rejected either, though I'd indeed appreciate a screenshot for the incredible "fascist" claim.) --Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Her "Loyalty in Culture" initiative should be on the page.

edit

Israel, Mired in Ideological Battles, Fights on Cultural Fronts - ctrl-f "The previous round".

AllThatJazz2012 (talk) 00:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Opinion is not fact

edit

Someone explain to me how the opinion of a haartz journalist is considered relevant or fact to be included in this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.107.210 (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

It's not considered a fact, the article explicitly says so. While I would like more context for this paragraph myself, simply removing it is unjustified. Do you take issue with the actual paragraph? —Ynhockey (Talk) 15:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vaginismus?

edit

This is a strange mention in her biography, particularly with no source. Possible vandalism? Mcsteez (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miri Regev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Miri Regev and the fans of Beitar Jerusalem

edit

Miri Regev Posts Video Surrounded By Genocidal Chants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMmJVC93_dc

Miri Regev with Beitar fans, January 22, 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS_ALvW40yI

10:10
Beitar Jerusalem fans: 'Here we are, we're the most racist football team in the country'
The Guardian
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJOV_cN-JP8

--Über-Blick (talk) 07:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:"Infobox member of the Knesset"

edit

 Template:Infobox member of the Knesset has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox officeholder. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply