Talk:Mirror (Porter Robinson song)

Reviewer Note

Song notability says that songs are only notable if there is a reasonable length article. This is a draft article, not a stub. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mirror (Porter Robinson song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 19:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Looking forward to that good topic! (I'll improve at least one of the singles to GA, I swear...) Skyshiftertalk 19:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Why am I not surprised? ;) Looking forward to your comments! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• Copyvio percentage is slighly high, but this is due to a correctly attributed quote box. This is actually fine.
• I did a small fix on DeVille's name.
• I've improved the fair use rationale.
• The infobox describes the genre as electro-pop, add this to the Background and composition section

   Done —TS

• "Critical acclaim" seems too strong without a source; I think you can say it received "positive reception" though. (Applies to the lead and "Critical reception"

   Done —TS

• "Mirror" released on -> "Mirror" was released on

  Both are technically correct, but your suggestion rolls off the tongue a little better.  Done —TS

• Dance Music Northwest is not a strong source; is a replacement possible?

   Comment: I recognize it's not the most high-quality of sources, and I've used it as minimally as possible — only to verify the statement that the sample was lifted from The School of Life's video. I don't believe any other source mentions this. —TS

• Some references are marked as dead but they aren't. It's the case with the refs 2, 9, 15

  Ah, a leftover from back in the day when I didn't know how to use the |url-status= parameter!  Fixed —TS

• Link The Line of Best Fit for ref. 13

   Done —TS

Spot-check

All references are properly formatted. I'll check the odd-numbered ones (from [1]).

• 1 Y
• 3 Y
• 5 It doesn't exactly confirm "during which he released very little music". (might need to be fixed in other articles...)

  Added a source to verify that. Also added to the Nurture and "Unfold" articles. —TS

• 7 Y
• 9 Y
• 11 Y
• 13 Y However, I think you should add along with "Do-re-mi-fa-so-la-ti-do" or similar.

   Not done. This might fit better in the article about the album, but doesn't add much here, in my opinion. —TS

• 15 Y However, it would be cool to specify that the avatar is a drawing of Robinson.

  It actually did before my rewrite this weekend, but I accidentally took that detail out.  Done —TS

 On hold Skyshiftertalk 22:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@Skyshifter: All comments addressed! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot to mention that I added a sample of the song. You'll want to do a criterion 6a check on that. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

The fair use rationale is valid. I am happy to ✓ Pass this article now! Skyshiftertalk 01:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.