Talk:Monty Can't Buy Me Love/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 15:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Wikilink Mr Burns in lead
• Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations
• You use the word "wrote" a lot in the reception section. Perhaps trying adding a bit more flavor and use different words?
• Add quotation marks to The Joy of Sect

Just makes suggested changes above and it will be good to go. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 15:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again! Queenieacoustic (talk) 17:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Awesome job. Pass for GA Ruby2010 comment! 18:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)