Talk:Morgan Roadster

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Lots of numbers, sadly not much text. This seems to be a pretty unique car, surely there's more to be said about it? –Kloth (talk) 10:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re. performance

edit

While a number of sources seem to suggest the 4.0L Rover was slower than the V6, I'm having a hard time finding numbers on the 4.6L version. The Range Rover version of the 4.6L had very similar power, lower, than the V6, and much, much more torque. It seems like it was left stock, but was the gearing/tyre combination really so far behind the V6's setup as to cancel out that torque advantage? Nevard (talk) 14:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morgan Roadster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply